How true this statement is. The American people have forgotten how true the statement above is and because we have a select, few have taken over our government. They have come to believe they know what we want, know what is best for us, and how to spend our money we work for better they we do. The arrogance of these people is shown almost every time to open their collective mouths.
I don't believe it is limited to just congress, remember Clinton making some statement along the lines that they knew how to spend our money better then we did. You know, before Clinton came along and said that, we had been spending our hard earned money for years without any problem except GOVERNMENT trying to take more and more of it.
Government is the problem and has been for many years. Many in Washington want to take care of us from birth to death. The latter will be decided by some committee that will decide if you are worth the money to be kept alive. Now they want to take over Health Care so they can control more of our freedoms and they will decide who get the best care. Do you really want the same people who can't run Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, US Postal Service handling our health care?
I know a lady who had Ovarian Cancer and if the government was running her health care she would have died. I say this because the health care she had, from the time is was diagnosed to surgery was SIX DAYS. Yes six days, saved her life. The doctors stated that in four months it went from an acorn size to softball. Does anyone really think a government run health care system would have saved her life? Do you want to take a chance with the same people who run SS, Medicare, Medicaid and the Post Office plus others.
Everyone needs to remember "WE THE PEOPLE" run the government and not "Temporary Workers" we placed there. If we ever want to take back control of our country and spending, 2010 is a very important year in history. We either once again take back control and make our Government afraid of "WE THE PEOPLE" or surrender our freedoms to a government who has lost touch with the people and display their arrogance daily.
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
EMERGENCY ALERT FOR GUN OWNERS, ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/h/hr45.htm
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
On your next (2010) tax return! As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope it isn't registered! Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.
This bill was introduced on Feb.. 24, 2009, by the Obama staff. BUT . . This bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all.
The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage, U.S. Senate. You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know.
Text of H.R.45 as introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 - U.S....Open Congress
Obama's Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don't fully comply. It has begun. Whatever Obama's secret Master Plan is....this is just the 'tip of the ice burg!' Very Important for you to be aware of an new bill HR 45 introduced into the House.
This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009. Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a 'minor' IRS revision, and, as usual, the 'political' lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it!
To find out about this -- go to any government web site and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information. Basically, this would make it illegal to own a firearm -- any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
It is registered. You are fingerprinted. You supply a current Driver's License. You supply your Social Security Number. You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing. Each update of change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25.
Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail. There is a child provision clause on page 16, Section 305, stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 years in prison.
If you think this is a joke -- go to the web site and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along.
Any hunters in your family pass this along. This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense -- chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it. This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not..
Search Results -- THOMAS (Library of Congress) <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45&; gt; http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45 http://Thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45:
H.R.45: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 - U.S. Congress - Open Congress <http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show>;
Please.. copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA , whether you support the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control. We all should have the right to choose.
The government takes your guns and then your rights. I can't believe "We the People" have may allow this to happen. Should this ever be signed into law, the time may be near where the American Flag and all the freedoms our forefathers fought for will be fought for again.
America wake up before it is to late or we will pay a very dear price to keep our rights. I pray it will not be in my lifetime but I'm very concerned it is coming as we have a president who believes in the Communists/Marxists teachings. Just look at the people around him and listen to what he says and then what he does. He claims to want a better America? He doesn't, he want a country that the GOVERNMENT runs and he is so very smooth about it. Since his election he has done everything to destroy our country and continues to do so every day.
I will have more to say about the fraud of a leader and his vision to destroy our country as he shreds the constitution we have defended for over 200 years. Stand up now, speak up (while you can) before we can't as freedom of speech is trying to be taken away in little pieces by HIS czar.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
On your next (2010) tax return! As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope it isn't registered! Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.
This bill was introduced on Feb.. 24, 2009, by the Obama staff. BUT . . This bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all.
Trust Obama? You must be kidding!
The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage, U.S. Senate. You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know.
Text of H.R.45 as introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 - U.S....Open Congress
Obama's Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don't fully comply. It has begun. Whatever Obama's secret Master Plan is....this is just the 'tip of the ice burg!' Very Important for you to be aware of an new bill HR 45 introduced into the House.
This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009. Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a 'minor' IRS revision, and, as usual, the 'political' lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it!
To find out about this -- go to any government web site and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information. Basically, this would make it illegal to own a firearm -- any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
It is registered. You are fingerprinted. You supply a current Driver's License. You supply your Social Security Number. You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing. Each update of change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25.
Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail. There is a child provision clause on page 16, Section 305, stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 years in prison.
If you think this is a joke -- go to the web site and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along.
Any hunters in your family pass this along. This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense -- chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it. This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not..
Search Results -- THOMAS (Library of Congress) <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45&; gt; http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45 http://Thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45:
H.R.45: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 - U.S. Congress - Open Congress <http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show>;
Please.. copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA , whether you support the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control. We all should have the right to choose.
ISN'T THIS THE TYPE OF THING THAT HAPPENS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT TAKES OVER AND DESTROYS OUR FREEDOMS ??
The government takes your guns and then your rights. I can't believe "We the People" have may allow this to happen. Should this ever be signed into law, the time may be near where the American Flag and all the freedoms our forefathers fought for will be fought for again.
America wake up before it is to late or we will pay a very dear price to keep our rights. I pray it will not be in my lifetime but I'm very concerned it is coming as we have a president who believes in the Communists/Marxists teachings. Just look at the people around him and listen to what he says and then what he does. He claims to want a better America? He doesn't, he want a country that the GOVERNMENT runs and he is so very smooth about it. Since his election he has done everything to destroy our country and continues to do so every day.
I will have more to say about the fraud of a leader and his vision to destroy our country as he shreds the constitution we have defended for over 200 years. Stand up now, speak up (while you can) before we can't as freedom of speech is trying to be taken away in little pieces by HIS czar.
STOP HR45 AND CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMAN & SENATORS TO LET THEM KNOW "WE THE PEOPLE" WILL NEVER SURRENDER OUR FREEDOMS.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Rush is Hosed by The Racists - Sharpton & Jackson
As a moderate I have had enough of the two clowns who call themselves Reverend. Yes, I am talking about Sharpton and Jackson the frauds from the pulpit.
They along with others have caused Mr. Limbaugh to be dropped from investing in the St Louis Rams because of what he has said in the past. If we are to be held to this standard then I believe it should also included the two Revs. who only tell the truth when it helps them.
Lets see, Sharpton and Brawley sure rings a bell. Wasn't old AL involved in the lies and fraud that he and others tried to perpetuate against some law enforcement officers? When the truth was uncovered old AL's hands weren't clean. He was so involved in the fraud that took place he was punished by nothing happening to him. Just another day at the office for a joke of a person.
Lets see, guilty of lying and he gets a walk because no one dared to confront him with his lies. The man has been and still is a problem for many Americans as he doesn't want a color blind America because if he did, no one would listen to him again.
Now we come to the another joke, Rev Jackson. He is no minister and has never been a minister in anyone eyes except those who believe anything he says. He is a liar, corporate extortionists and a number of other things but enough has been said about him. Does anyone remember something about a riot at a football game?
We have allowed these two clowns to dictate who can own what, say what, do what in a so called free country. For over forty plus years black Americans have listened to these clowns and what do they have to show. Liberal democrats didn't vote for civil rights, Republicans did. The southern democrats didn't have the courage to stand up and say enough, Republicans did. Al Gores daddy voted AGAINST the civil rights law.
Better stop now as getting off course. One more item, as one of the owners (colts) spoke up and voiced his opinion. He should not throw bricks as he is the one who SLITHERED OUT OF TOWN in the middle of the night to move his team to another city. Talk about gutless.
If you have a problem with Mr. Limbaugh, protest, boycott him, but before you do, get the facts for yourself and then decide. Don't follow the clowns, follow the truth wherever it goes.
They along with others have caused Mr. Limbaugh to be dropped from investing in the St Louis Rams because of what he has said in the past. If we are to be held to this standard then I believe it should also included the two Revs. who only tell the truth when it helps them.
Lets see, Sharpton and Brawley sure rings a bell. Wasn't old AL involved in the lies and fraud that he and others tried to perpetuate against some law enforcement officers? When the truth was uncovered old AL's hands weren't clean. He was so involved in the fraud that took place he was punished by nothing happening to him. Just another day at the office for a joke of a person.
Lets see, guilty of lying and he gets a walk because no one dared to confront him with his lies. The man has been and still is a problem for many Americans as he doesn't want a color blind America because if he did, no one would listen to him again.
Now we come to the another joke, Rev Jackson. He is no minister and has never been a minister in anyone eyes except those who believe anything he says. He is a liar, corporate extortionists and a number of other things but enough has been said about him. Does anyone remember something about a riot at a football game?
We have allowed these two clowns to dictate who can own what, say what, do what in a so called free country. For over forty plus years black Americans have listened to these clowns and what do they have to show. Liberal democrats didn't vote for civil rights, Republicans did. The southern democrats didn't have the courage to stand up and say enough, Republicans did. Al Gores daddy voted AGAINST the civil rights law.
Better stop now as getting off course. One more item, as one of the owners (colts) spoke up and voiced his opinion. He should not throw bricks as he is the one who SLITHERED OUT OF TOWN in the middle of the night to move his team to another city. Talk about gutless.
If you have a problem with Mr. Limbaugh, protest, boycott him, but before you do, get the facts for yourself and then decide. Don't follow the clowns, follow the truth wherever it goes.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Open Letter to Maine Senator
I am very sorry you have decided to support a bill that the majority of Americans don't want in it's present state. Washington has lost touch with the very people who elected them and act as if "We the People" have become a joke. You might as well get the constitution and shred it as Obama never heard of it based on what he has done while you and others turn a blind eye.
As an independent I will now support with dollars anyone who runs against you and puts the American People first. Instead of taking time to fix our system you have made it worse. My wife has cancer and is fighting for her life but YOU are allowing Medicare to be cut which could effect her.
Obama talks about savings in Medicare, what a joke. We both know that will never happen. The Government has never run anything that worked as intended. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Post Office, and more that would take all this page to mention don't work because of you and others.
Tax (coming) increases, higher medical care, higher unemployment is what Obama and you folks are giving us. Now I hear about VAT taxes. My business has all but died because of Government forcing low cost loans to those who shouldn't have had loans. Tell Barney thanks and send a card to Acorn.
Now this, thanks for nothing but more problems for the average American. I will do everything I can to see you are not re-elected. We need to get rid of big spenders like you and the others.
As an independent I will now support with dollars anyone who runs against you and puts the American People first. Instead of taking time to fix our system you have made it worse. My wife has cancer and is fighting for her life but YOU are allowing Medicare to be cut which could effect her.
Obama talks about savings in Medicare, what a joke. We both know that will never happen. The Government has never run anything that worked as intended. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Post Office, and more that would take all this page to mention don't work because of you and others.
Tax (coming) increases, higher medical care, higher unemployment is what Obama and you folks are giving us. Now I hear about VAT taxes. My business has all but died because of Government forcing low cost loans to those who shouldn't have had loans. Tell Barney thanks and send a card to Acorn.
Now this, thanks for nothing but more problems for the average American. I will do everything I can to see you are not re-elected. We need to get rid of big spenders like you and the others.
Friday, October 2, 2009
What is the Truth?
Obama Occidental College records, Subpoenaed records, Obama ineligible, Gary Kreep, U.S. Justice Foundation, Barry Soetero, College lawyers, Stuart W. Rudnick of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Fredric D. Woocher, Worldnetdaily.com, February 13, 2009 · 87 Comments
More evidence that Obama is hiding his past and is not eligible to be president. From World Net Daily,February 13, 2009:“‘Sanctions’ sought in eligibility case President’s attorneys file motion demanding birth, college records be withheld from public”
“By Bob Unruh”
“A high-powered team of Los Angeles attorneys representing President Obama in his effort to keep his birth certificate, college records and passport documents concealed from the public has suggested there should be “monetary sanctions” against a lawyer whose clients have brought a complaint alleging Obama doesn’t qualify for the Oval Office under the Constitution’s demand for a “natural born” citizen in that post.
The suggestion came in an exchange of e-mails and documents in a case brought by former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others in California. The case originally sought to have the state’s electors ordered to withhold their votes for Obama until his eligibility was established. Since his inauguration, it has been amended to seek a future requirement for a vetting process, in addition to the still-sought unveiling of Obama’s records.
In the case, being handled largely by Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation, he recently subpoenaed the records documenting the attendance by Obama, or possibly the student when he was known as Barry Soetero, from Occidental College.
The lawyer for the college, Stuart W. Rudnick of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, urgently contacted Fredric D. Woocher of Strumwasser & Woocher. “This firm is counsel to Occidental College. The College is in receipt of the enclosed subpoena that seeks certain information concerning President-Elect Barack Obama,” he wrote via fax.
“Inasmuch as the subpoena appears to be valid on its face, the College will have no alternative but to comply with the subpoena absent a court order instructing otherwise.”
Within hours, Woocher contacted Kreep regarding the issue, telling him, “It will likely not surprise you to hear that President-elect Obama opposes the production of the requested records.“In order to avoid the needless expense of our bringing and litigating a Motion to Quash the subpoena, I am writing to ask whether you would be willing to agree voluntarily to cancel or withdraw the subpoena…”
Woocher warned, “Please be advised, in particular, that in the event we are forced to file a motion to quash and we prevail in that motion, we will seek the full measure of monetary sanctions provided for in the Code of Civil Procedures.” “
”OBAMA has been inaugurated as the president of the United States. However, to properly assume such office, OBAMA must meet the qualifications specified in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution for the Office of the President of the United States, which includes that he must be a ‘natural born’ citizen,” the amended complaint states.
“OBAMA has failed to demonstrate that he is a ‘natural born’ citizen. There have been a number of legal challenges before various state and federal courts regarding aspects of non-, lost, or dual citizenship concerning OBAMA. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners’ argument that reasonable doubt exists as to his eligibility to serve as President of the United States.
“To avert a constitutional crisis which would certainly accrue after such an election through laborious legal challenges, this writ seeks to require SOS (Secretary of State) to verify the eligibility of a Presidential candidate prior to the candidate appearing on the California ballot. It is incumbent on the candidates to present the necessary documentation confirming his or her eligibility, but, to date, for this past election, OBAMA has failed to do so,” the complaint continues.
“An unprecedented and looming constitutional crisis awaits if a President elected by the popular vote and the electoral vote does not constitutionally qualify to serve in that capacity,” the case said. “In addition, if OBAMA is not a ‘natural born’ citizen and not eligible for presidency, OBAMA will be subject to the criminal provisions of the California Elections Code, stating, ‘Any person who files or submits for filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy knowing that it, or any part of it, has been made falsely, is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months or two or three years or by both the fine and imprisonment,’” the complaint states. “
Read more here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88746
This is being added to only inform and I take no position on this yet. It is interesting that all information about Obama is being hidden from the American Voters. Makes you wonder!!!!!!!
More evidence that Obama is hiding his past and is not eligible to be president. From World Net Daily,February 13, 2009:“‘Sanctions’ sought in eligibility case President’s attorneys file motion demanding birth, college records be withheld from public”
“By Bob Unruh”
“A high-powered team of Los Angeles attorneys representing President Obama in his effort to keep his birth certificate, college records and passport documents concealed from the public has suggested there should be “monetary sanctions” against a lawyer whose clients have brought a complaint alleging Obama doesn’t qualify for the Oval Office under the Constitution’s demand for a “natural born” citizen in that post.
The suggestion came in an exchange of e-mails and documents in a case brought by former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others in California. The case originally sought to have the state’s electors ordered to withhold their votes for Obama until his eligibility was established. Since his inauguration, it has been amended to seek a future requirement for a vetting process, in addition to the still-sought unveiling of Obama’s records.
In the case, being handled largely by Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation, he recently subpoenaed the records documenting the attendance by Obama, or possibly the student when he was known as Barry Soetero, from Occidental College.
The lawyer for the college, Stuart W. Rudnick of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, urgently contacted Fredric D. Woocher of Strumwasser & Woocher. “This firm is counsel to Occidental College. The College is in receipt of the enclosed subpoena that seeks certain information concerning President-Elect Barack Obama,” he wrote via fax.
“Inasmuch as the subpoena appears to be valid on its face, the College will have no alternative but to comply with the subpoena absent a court order instructing otherwise.”
Within hours, Woocher contacted Kreep regarding the issue, telling him, “It will likely not surprise you to hear that President-elect Obama opposes the production of the requested records.“In order to avoid the needless expense of our bringing and litigating a Motion to Quash the subpoena, I am writing to ask whether you would be willing to agree voluntarily to cancel or withdraw the subpoena…”
Woocher warned, “Please be advised, in particular, that in the event we are forced to file a motion to quash and we prevail in that motion, we will seek the full measure of monetary sanctions provided for in the Code of Civil Procedures.” “
”OBAMA has been inaugurated as the president of the United States. However, to properly assume such office, OBAMA must meet the qualifications specified in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution for the Office of the President of the United States, which includes that he must be a ‘natural born’ citizen,” the amended complaint states.
“OBAMA has failed to demonstrate that he is a ‘natural born’ citizen. There have been a number of legal challenges before various state and federal courts regarding aspects of non-, lost, or dual citizenship concerning OBAMA. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners’ argument that reasonable doubt exists as to his eligibility to serve as President of the United States.
“To avert a constitutional crisis which would certainly accrue after such an election through laborious legal challenges, this writ seeks to require SOS (Secretary of State) to verify the eligibility of a Presidential candidate prior to the candidate appearing on the California ballot. It is incumbent on the candidates to present the necessary documentation confirming his or her eligibility, but, to date, for this past election, OBAMA has failed to do so,” the complaint continues.
“An unprecedented and looming constitutional crisis awaits if a President elected by the popular vote and the electoral vote does not constitutionally qualify to serve in that capacity,” the case said. “In addition, if OBAMA is not a ‘natural born’ citizen and not eligible for presidency, OBAMA will be subject to the criminal provisions of the California Elections Code, stating, ‘Any person who files or submits for filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy knowing that it, or any part of it, has been made falsely, is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months or two or three years or by both the fine and imprisonment,’” the complaint states. “
Read more here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88746
This is being added to only inform and I take no position on this yet. It is interesting that all information about Obama is being hidden from the American Voters. Makes you wonder!!!!!!!
Monday, September 28, 2009
Somewhat disturbing........Thanks to Obama
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
If George W. Bush had spent 300 thousand dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in five months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer.
Can't take credit as this was on the net and so very true.
If George W. Bush had spent 300 thousand dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in five months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer.
Can't take credit as this was on the net and so very true.
Obama and the Brown Shirts are Back
September 25, 2009
Categories: Senate
Ensign receives handwritten confirmation
This doesn't happen often enough.
Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance.
Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it "Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold."
The note was a follow-up to Ensign's questioning at the markup.
By Carrie Budoff Brown 11:40 AM
Categories: Senate
Ensign receives handwritten confirmation
This doesn't happen often enough.
Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance.
Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it "Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold."
The note was a follow-up to Ensign's questioning at the markup.
By Carrie Budoff Brown 11:40 AM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
IRAN WINS TELLS TRUMP HOW IT ENDS
Trump is finally seeing his fight with Iran has been lost and now says Iran can keep the Nuclear Dust as he will be leaving office soon so t...
-
SEND THIS ON,DO ALL YOU CAN,Our COUNTRY is in TERRIBLE TROUBLE!!! PRAY!!!!!!!! *Subject:* OBAMA STOPS WOUNDED SOLDIER FROM SPEAKING!! Se...
-
If not us...who? If not now...when? Ronald Reagan This is from the Wall Street Journal which makes it even more intere...
-
Some of the nonsense I am hearing about the talks with the nuts in Iran will mean nothing but only delay the Nuclear problem as Trump would...