Friday, April 19, 2024

What do you Think??????????

 Below are the Articles of Impeachment that the Liberals blew off, read and you decide.

page1image541534720

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF SUBSTITUTE H.RES863

OFFEREDBYMRGREENOF TENNESSEE

Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the following

That Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas Secretary of Home land Security of the United States of America is im

  1. 3  peached for high crimes and misdemeanors and that the

  2. 4  following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the

  3. 5  United States Senate:

  4. 6  Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of

  5. 7  Representatives of the United States of America in the

  6. 8  name of itself and of the people of the United States of

  7. 9  America against Alejandro N. Mayorkas Secretary of

  8. 10  Homeland Security of the United States of America, in

11 maintenance and support of its impeachment against him

12 for high crimes and misdemeanors .
13 ARTICLE I: WILLFUL AND SYSTEMIC REFUSAL TO COMPLY

14 WITHTHELAW
15 TheConstitutionprovidesthattheHouseofRep 16 resentatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment 17 andthatcivilOfficersoftheUnitedStates,includingthe 18 Secretary of Homeland Securityshall be removed from

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715 January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page2image539586384

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

2

  1. 1  Office on Impeachment forand Conviction ofTreason,

  2. 2  Bribery,or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors .Inhis

  3. 3  conduct while Secretary of Homeland Security,Alejandro

  4. 4  N. Mayorkas in violation of his oath to support and de

  5. 5  fend the Constitution of the United States against all en

  6. 6  emies,foreign and domestic,to bear true faith and alle

  7. 7  giance to the same,and to well and faithfully discharge

  8. 8  the duties of his office,has willfully and systemically re

  9. 9  fused to comply with Federal immigration lawsin that

10

Throughout his tenure as Secretary of Homeland Se 11 curity Alejandro N. Mayorkas has repeatedly violated 12 laws enacted by Congress regarding immigration and bor

  1. 13  dersecurity.Inlargepartbecauseofhisunlawfulconduct,

  2. 14  millions of aliens have illegally entered the United States

  3. 15  onanannualbasiswithmanyunlawfullyremaininginthe

  4. 16  United States. His refusal to obey the law is not only an

  5. 17  offense against the separation of powers in the Constitu

  6. 18  tion of the United Statesit also threatens our national

  7. 19  security and has had a dire impact oncommunities across

20 the country Despite clear evidence that his willful and

systemic refusal to comply with the law has significantly

  1. 22  contributed to unprecedented levels of illegal entrants,the

  2. 23  increased control of the Southwest border by drug cartels ,

  3. 24  and the imposition of enormous costs on States and local

25 ities affected by the influx of aliensAlejandro N.

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page3image541481216

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

23 24 25

012824 E012824.001.xml January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

ceedings and determined to have credible fear of persecution shall be detained for further consider

ationoftheapplicationforasylum .Insteadofcom 91632715)

4

Alejandro N. Mayorkas engaged in this scheme or

course of conduct through the following means:

7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21

(1Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully refused to comply with the detention mandate set forth in sec tion 235(b)(2)(Aof the Immigration and Nation

ality Act,requiring that all applicants for admission who are not clearly and beyond doubt entitled to be admitted shall be detained for [removalpro ceeding Instead of complying with this require mentAlejandro N. Mayorkas implemented a catch

and release scheme,whereby such aliens areunlaw

fully released,even without effective mechanisms to

ensure appearances before the immigration courts

for removal proceedings or to ensure removal in the case of aliens ordered removed.

(2Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully refused to comply with the detention mandate set forth in sec tion 235(b)(1)(B)(iiof such requiring that an

3

Mayorkas has continued in his refusal to comply with the law,and thereby acted to the grave detriment of the inter 3 estsoftheUnitedStates.

22 alienwhoisplacedintoexpeditedremovalpro

page4image541925536

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

24 25

012824 E012824.001.xml January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

criminal and terrorism-related grounds shall [be] take ninto custody when the alien is released

91632715)

4

  1. 1  plying with this requirement ,Alejandro N. Mayorkas

  2. 2  implemented catch and release schemewhereby

such aliens areunlawfully released,evenwithout ef fective mechanisms to ensure appearances before the

3
4
immigration courts for removal proceedings or to en

sure removal in the case of aliens ordered removed .

6

  1. 7  (3) Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully refused to

  2. 8  comply with the detention set forth in section

  3. 9  235(b)(1)(B)(iii)(IV) of such Act,requiring that an

10 alienwhoisplacedintoexpeditedremovalpro

  1. 11  ceedingsanddeterminednottohaveacrediblefear

  2. 12  of persecution shall be detained until removed .

  3. 13  Instead of complying with this requirement ,

  4. 14  AlejandroN.Mayorkashasimplementedacatch

  5. 15  andreleasescheme,wherebysuchaliensareunlaw

  6. 16  fullyreleased,evenwithouteffectivemechanismsto

  7. 17  ensureappearancesbeforetheimmigrationcourts

  8. 18  forremovalproceedingsortoensureremovalinthe

22 tion236()ofsuch ,requiringthatacriminal 23 alienwhoisinadmissibleordeportableoncertain

case of aliens ordered removed .

19
20 
(4)AlejandroN.Mayorkaswillfullyrefusedto 21 complywiththedetentionmandatesetforthinsec

page5image667960208

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

23 24 25

012824 E012824.001.xml January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

complywiththedetentionmandatesetforthinsec tion241(a)(2)ofsuchAct,requiringthatanalien ordered removed "shall [bedetain[ed during the

91632715)

1

2 3 4 5

7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

5
from law enforcement custody.Instead of complying

with this requirement ,Alejandro N. Mayorkas issued Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigra tion Laws ,which instructs Department of Home

land Security (hereinafter referred to as DHS of ficials that the fact an individual is removable noncitizen should not alone be the basis of an en

forcement action against them and that DHS per sonnel should not rely on the fact of convic

tion alone even with respect to aliens subject to mandatory arrest and detention pursuant to section 236( of such Act,to take them into custody.In Texas v.United States,40 F.4th 205 (2022),the

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded that these guidelines had every indica tion of being general policy that is so extreme as

17 to amount to an abdication of statutory responsibil

ities and that its replacement of Congress's stat

18 19

22 (5)AlejandroN.Mayorkaswillfullyrefusedto

utory mandates with concerns of equity and race is

  1. 20  extralegal[and]plainlyoutsidetheboundsofthe

  2. 21  powerconferredbytheINA.

page6image539262608

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

6
removal period Instead of complying with this

2 3 4 5

mandateAlejandro N. Mayorkas issued Guidelines

for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Laws which instructs DHS officials that the fact an indi

vidual is removable noncitizen should not alone be

the basis of an enforcement action against them and that DHS "personnel should not rely on the

fact of conviction alone even with respect to

  1. 9  aliens subject to mandatory detention and removal

  2. 10  pursuanttosection241(a)ofsuchAct.

  3. 11  (6)AlejandroN.Mayorkaswillfullyexceeded

  4. 12  hisparoleauthoritysetforthinsection212(d)(5)(A)

  5. 13  of such Act that permits parole to be granted only

  6. 14  on a case-by-case basis temporarily and for ur

6

8

15

16

17

gent humanitarian reasons or significant public ben efit ,in that:

(A ) Alejandro N. Mayorkas paroled aliens en masse in order to release them from manda

18
19 tory detention despite the fact that as the

20 UnitedStatesCourtofAppealsfortheFifth

21 22 23

Circuit concluded in Texas vBiden20 F.4th 928 (2021)parol[ingevery alien [DHScannot detain is the opposite of the case-by-case

24 basis determinations required by law and 25 DHS'spretendedpowertoparolealienswhile

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page7image536933696

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

6

8 9 10

foreign nationals outside of the United Statesincluding for certain Central American minors,UkrainiansVenezuelans Cubans Haitians,

7

ignoring the limitations Congress imposed on

  1. 2  the parole power is] not nonenforcementit's

  2. 3  misenforcementsuspension of the INA, or

  3. 4  both

  4. 5  (BAlejandro N. Mayorkas createdre

    opened,or expanded series of categorical pa

role programs never authorized by Congress for

1

11 Nicaraguans,Colombians,Salvadorans,Guate 12 malans,andHondurans,whichenabledhun

dreds of thousands of inadmissible aliens to enter the United States in violation of the laws

enacted by Congress
(7) Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully exceeded

13
14
15
16
17 hisreleaseauthoritysetforthinsection236(a)of

18 19

such Act that permits in certain circumstances the release of aliens arrested on an administrative war

20 rant,inthatAlejandroN.Mayorkasreleasedaliens

arrested without warrant despite their being sub 22 jecttoaseparateapplicablemandatorydetentionre

23 quirementsetforthinsection235(b)(2)ofsuchAct24 AlejandroN.Mayorkasreleasedsuchaliensby25 retroactivelyissuingadministrativewarrantsinan

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

21

page8image541471088

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

  1. 1  attempt to circumvent section 235(b)(2) of such Act.

  2. 2  In Florida vUnited StatesNo. 3:21- -1066-TKW

  3. 3  ZCB (N.D. FlaMar. 82023)the United States

    District Court of the Northern District of Florida

noted that his sleight of hand using an arrest

warrant as de facto releasewarrant is adminis

  1. 7  trative sophistry at its worst .In addition,the court

  2. 8  concluded that what makes DHS's application of

4

6

in this manner unlawful is that

  1. 10  235(b)(2),not236(a),governsthedetentionof

  2. 11  applicants for admission whom DHS places

12 inremovalproceedingsafterinspection

9

[236(a)]

13
14 to comply with the law has had calamitous consequences 15 for the Nation and the people of the United States,includ 16 ing:
17 (1)Duringfiscalyears2017through 2020,an 18 averageofabout590,000alienseachfiscalyear19 wereencounteredasinadmissiblealiensatportsof

20 entryontheSouthwestborderorapprehendedbe 21 tweenportsofentry.Thereafter,duringAlejandro 22 N.Mayorkas'stenureinoffice,thatnumbersky 23 rocketedtoover1,400,000infiscalyear2021,over

24 2,300,000infiscalyear2022,andover2,400,000in 25 fiscalyear2023.Similarly,duringfiscalyears2017

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

AlejandroN.Mayorkas'swillfulandsystemicrefusal

page9image540328576

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22

23 24 25

012824 E012824.001.xml January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

9

  1. 1  through 2020an average of 130,000 persons who

  2. 2  were not turned back or apprehended after making

  3. 3  an illegal entry were observed along the border each

  4. 4  fiscal yearDuring Alejandro N. Mayorkas's tenure

  5. 5  in officethat number more than trebled to 400,000

  6. 6  in fiscal year 2021600,000 in fiscal year 2022 and

  7. 7  750,000 in fiscal year 2023.

  8. 8  (2) American communities both along the

grantedparole,creatingafiscalandhumanitarian crisisanddramaticallydegradingthequalityoflifeof the residents of those communitiesFor instancesince 2022more than 150,000 migrants have gone throughNewYorkCity'sshelterintakesystem.In deed,the Mayor of New York City has said that we are past our breaking point and that his issuewilldestroyNewYorkCity.Infiscalyear2023NewYorkCityspent$1,450,000,000addressing AlejandroN.Mayorkas'smigrantcrisis,andcityof ficialsfearitwillspendanother$12,000,000,000overthefollowingthreefiscalyears,causingpainful budgetcutstoimportantcityservices.

91632715)

Southwest border and across the United States have

9
10 beendevastatedbythedramaticgrowthinillegalen 11 tries,thenumberofaliensunlawfullypresent,and 12 substantialriseinthenumberofaliensunlawfully

page10image536938896

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

4

7

8 9 10

cording to the United Nations's International Orga nization for Migration,the number of migrants in tending to illegally cross our border who have per

ished along the wayeither en route to the United States or at the borderalmost doubled during the

1

11 tenureofAlejandroN.MayorkasasSecretaryof 12 HomelandSecurity,fromanaverageofabout700

year during the fiscal years 2017 through 202014 toanaverageofabout1,300ayearduringthefiscal 15 years2021through2023.

16 (4)Aliensmugglingorganizationshavegained

  1. 17  tremendouswealthduringAlejandroN.Mayorkas's

  2. 18  tenureasSecretaryofHomelandSecurity,with

  3. 19  their estimated revenues rising from about

  4. 20  $500,000,000 in 2018 to approximately

  5. 21  $13,000,000,000in2022

22 (5)DuringAlejandroN.Mayorkas'stenureas 23 SecretaryofHomelandSecurity,theimmigration 24 courtbackloghasmorethandoubledfromabout 25 1,300,000casestoover3,000,000cases.Theex

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

13

10

(3) Alejandro N. Mayorkas's unlawful mass re lease of apprehended aliens and unlawful mass grant

of categorical parole to aliens have enticed an in creasing number of aliens to make the dangerous journey to our Southwest border.Consequently,ac

page11image400584064

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

11

  1. 1  ploding backlog is destroying the courts ability to

  2. 2  administer justice and provide appropriate relief in

  3. 3  timeframe that does not run into years or even

  4. 4  decades As Alejandro N. Mayorkas acknowledged

  5. 5  those who have valid claim to asylum often wait

  6. 6  years for a decisionlikewisenoncitizens who will

  7. 7  ultimately be found ineligible for asylum or other

  8. 8  protection which occurs in the majority of cases

  9. 9  often have spent many years in the United States

  10. 10  priortobeingorderedremoved.Henotedthatof

  11. 11  aliensplacedinexpeditedremovalproceedingsand

  12. 12  foundtohaveacrediblefearofpersecution,and

  13. 13  thusreferredtoimmigrationjudgesforremovalpro

  14. 14  ceedings,significantlyfewerthan20percentwere

  15. 15  ultimately granted asylum and only 28 percent of

  16. 16  casesdecidedontheirmeritsaregrantsofrelief.

  17. 17  Alejandro N. Mayorkas also admitted that the fact

    that migrants can wait in the United States for

19 yearsbeforebeingissuedafinalorderdenyingrelief,

20 andthatmanysuchindividualsareneveractually 21 removed,likelyincentivizesmigrantstomakethe

22 journeynorth

18

(6) During Alejandro N. Mayorkas's tenure as Secretary of Homeland Securityapproximately

23
24
25 
450,000unaccompaniedalienchildrenhavebeenen

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page12image1413659936

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

1

2 3 4 5

7

8 9

12
countered at the Southwest border,and the vast ma

jority have been released into the United States.As result,there has been dramatic upsurge in mi grant children being employed in dangerous and ex

ploitative jobs in the United States.
(7Alejandro N. Mayorkas's failure to enforce

18

the lawdrawing millions of illegal aliens to the Southwest border, has led to the reassignment of

U.S. Border Patrol agents from protecting the bor

  1. 10  derfromillicitdrugtraffickingtoprocessingillegal

  2. 11  aliensforrelease.Asaresult,duringAlejandroN.

  3. 12  Mayorkas'stenureasSecretaryofHomelandSecu

    rity,the flow of fentanyl across the border and other

14 dangerousdrugs,bothatandbetweenportsof

13

entryhas increased dramatically U.S. Customs and

15
16
17 poundsoffentanylinfiscalyear2020,approxi

Border

Protection seized approximately 4,800

mately 11,200 pounds in fiscal year 2021approxi 19 mately14,700poundsinfiscalyear2022,andap

20 proximately27,000poundsinfiscalyear2023.Over 21 70,000Americansdiedfromfentanylpoisoningin 22 2022,andfentanylisnowthenumberonekillerof

Americans between the ages of 18 and 45.

23
24
25 safetybyleavingwideswathsofthebordereffec

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

(8) Alejandro N. Mayorkas has degraded public

page13image1413620480

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

13

  1. 1  tively unpatrolled as U.S. Border Patrol agents are

  2. 2  diverted from guarding the border to processing for

  3. 3  unlawful release the heightening waves of appre

  4. 4  hended aliens (many who now seek out agents for

  5. 5  the purpose of surrendering with the now reasonable

  6. 6  expectation of being released and granted work au

  7. 7  thorization ) and Federal Air Marshals are diverted

  8. 8  from protecting the flying public to assist in such

  9. 9  processing

10 (9)DuringAlejandroN.Mayorkas'stenureas

  1. 11  SecretaryofHomelandSecurity,theU.S.Border

  2. 12  Patrolhasencounteredanincreasingnumberof

    aliens on the terrorist watch list. In fiscal years

  1. 14  2017through2020combined,11noncitizensonthe

  2. 15  terroristwatchlistwerecaughtattemptingtocross

  3. 16  theSouthwestborderbetweenportsofentry.That

  4. 17  numberincreasedto15infiscalyear2021,98in

  5. 18  fiscalyear2022,169infiscalyear2023,and49so

  6. 19  farinfiscalyear2024.

  7. 20  Additionally , in United States Texas 599 U.S. 670

21 (2023)the United States Supreme Court heard case

22 involving Alejandro N. Mayorkas's refusal to comply with 23 certain Federal immigration laws that are at issue in this 24 impeachment The Supreme Court held that States have 25 no standing to seek judicial relief to compel Alejandro N.

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

13

page14image1413627424

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

14
Mayorkas to comply with certain legal requirements con

  1. 2  tained in the Immigration and Nationality Act.However,

  2. 3  the Supreme Court held that even though the federal

    courts lack Article jurisdiction over this suit,other fo

  1. 5  rums remain open for examining the Executive Branch's

  2. 6  enforcement policies.For example,Congress possesses an

  3. 7  array oftools to analyze and influence those policies [and]

  4. 8  those are political checks for the political process .One

  5. 9  critical tool for Congress to influence the Executive

  6. 10  Branch to comply with the immigration laws of the United

11 States is impeachment The dissenting Justice noted12 The Court holds Texas lacks standing to challenge fed

13 eral policy that inflicts substantial harm on the State and 14 its residents by releasing illegal aliens with criminal con 15 victions for serious crimes.In order to reach this conclu

16 sion,the Court...holds that the only limit onthe power 17 of President to disobey a law like the important provi 18 sion at issue is Congress power to employ the weapons 19 of inter-branch warfare .As the dissenting Justice ex

20 plainedCongress may wield what the Solicitor General 21 described as political tools which presumably means

  1. 22  things as impeachment and removal Indeed,dur

  2. 23  ing oral argument ,the Justice who authored the majority

  3. 24  opinion stated to the Solicitor General think your posi

  4. 25  tion is,instead of judicial review,Congress has to resort

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page15image1414214000

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

15
to shutting down the government or impeachment or dra

matic steps ". Herein light of the inability of injured parties to seek judicial relief to remedy the refusal of Alejandro N. Mayorkas to comply with Federal immigra tion lawsimpeachment is Congress's only viable option6

In all of thisAlejandro N. Mayorkas willfully and

  1. 7  systemically refused to comply with the immigration laws,

  2. 8  failed to control the border to the detriment of national

  1. 9  securitycompromised public safetyand violated the rule

  2. 10  of law and separation of powers in the Constitution to

    the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

12

Wherefore Alejandro N. Mayorkas,by such conduct,

  1. 13  has demonstrated that he will remain threat to national

  2. 14  and border security the safety of the United States peo

  3. 15  pleand the Constitution if allowed to remain in office,

  4. 16  and has acted in manner grossly incompatible with his

  5. 17  duties and the rule of lawAlejandro N. Mayorkas thus

  6. 18  warrants impeachment and trial,removal from office,and

  7. 19  disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor,

  8. 20  trust,orprofitundertheUnitedStates.

  9. 21  ARTICLEIIBREACHOF PUBLICTRUST

22 TheConstitutionprovidesthattheHouseofRep

  1. 23  resentatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment

  2. 24  and that civil Officers of the United States,including the

  3. 25  Secretary of Homeland Security, shall be removed from

  4. 26  Office Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715 January 282024 (10:30 a.m.)

page16image539306768

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

16
Briberyor other high Crimes and Misdemeanors In his

  1. 2  conduct while Secretary of Homeland SecurityAlejandro

  2. 3  N. Mayorkasin violation of his oath to well and faithfully

    discharge the duties of his officehas breached the public

trust,inthat:

the Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter re ferred to as "DHS )principally to obfuscate the results 10 of his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law.

11 Alejandro N. Mayorkas engaged in this scheme or course 12 of conduct through the following means:

4

has knowingly made false 7 statements and knowingly obstructed lawful oversight of

6

Alejando N. Mayorkas

13

14

15

16

(1Alejandro N. Mayorkas knowingly made falsestatementstoCongressthattheborderis se

cure that the border is no less secure than it was previously,thattheborderis closed,andthat

17 DHShasoperationalcontroloftheborder(as

that term is defined in the Secure Fence Act of 19 2006).

20 (2)AlejandroN.Mayorkasknowinglymade 21 falsestatementstoCongressregardingthescope

22 andadequacyofthevettingofthethousandsofAf 23 ghanswhowereairliftedtotheUnitedStatesand

24 thengrantedparolefollowingtheTalibantakeover

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

18

page17image1414463600

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

18

22 23

Congress

Additionally in his conduct while Secretary of Home

1

17
of Afghanistan after President Biden's precipitous

  1. 2  withdrawal of United States forces.

  2. 3  (3) Alejandro N. Mayorkas knowingly made

  3. 4  false statements that apprehended aliens with no

  4. 5  legal basis to remain in the United States were

  5. 6  being quickly removed.

  6. 7  (4Alejandro N. Mayorkas knowingly made

  7. 8  false statements supporting the false narrative that

  8. 9  U.S. Border Patrol agents maliciously whipped ille

    gal aliens

10 11 12

  1. 13  committees.

  2. 14  (6)AlejandroN.Mayorkasdelayedordenied

(5) Alejandro N. Mayorkas failed to comply with multiple subpoenas issued by congressional

access of DHS Office of Inspector General (herein after referred to as OIG to DHS records and in

15
16
17 formation hampering OIG's ability to effectively

perform its vital investigations audits inspections ,

  1. 19  andotherreviewsofagencyprogramsandoper

  2. 20  ationstosatisfytheOIG'sobligationsundersection

  3. 21  402(b)oftitle5,UnitedStatesCode,inpart,to

24 land SecurityAlejandro N. Mayorkas has breached the 25 public trust by his willful refusal to fulfill his statutory

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page18image540517344

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

18

  1. 1  duty to control and guard the boundaries and borders

  2. 2  of the United States against the illegal entry of aliens as set forth in section 103(a)(5) of the Immigration and

  1. 4  Nationality Act.Alejandro N. Mayorkas inherited what his

  2. 5  first Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol calledarguably the

  3. 6  most effective border security in our nation's history

  4. 7  Alejandro Mayorkas , however proceeded to abandon

  5. 8  effective border security initiatives without engaging in

  6. 9  adequate alternative efforts that would enable DHS to

  7. 10  maintain control of the border and guard against illegal

  8. 11  entry and despite clear evidence of the devastating con

  9. 12  sequences of his actionshe failed to take action to fulfill

  10. 13  his statutory duty to control the border.According to his

  11. 14  first Chief of the U.S. Border PatrolAlejandro N.

  12. 15  Mayorkas summarily rejectedthe "multiple options to

  13. 16  reduce the illegal entries...through proven programs and

  14. 17  consequences provided by civil service staff at DHS.De

  15. 18  spite clear evidence of the devastating consequences of his

  16. 19  actions he failed to take action to fulfill his statutory duty

  17. 20  tocontroltheborder,inthat,amongotherthings:

21 (1)AlejandroN.MayorkasterminatedtheMi 22 grantProtectionProtocols(hereinafterreferredto23 as MPP).InTexasv.Biden,20F.4th928

24 (2021),theUnitedStatesCourtofAppealsforthe 25 Fifth Circuit explained that t]he district

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

page19image540249216

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

2

MPP has contributed to the current border

19
court pointed to evidence that the termination of

surge (citing DHS's own previous determinations

  1. 4  that MPP had curbed the rate of illegal entries.

  2. 5  The district court had also pointed out that the

3

7

8 9

number of enforcement encounters that is, in stances where immigration officials encounter immigrants attempting to cross the southern border with

out documentation had skyrocketed since MPP's

10 termination

(2)AlejandroN.Mayorkasterminatedcon tracts for border wall construction .

11
12
13
14
15
16 asylumaccords.

  1. 17  In all of this Alejandro N. Mayorkas breached the

  2. 18  public trust by knowingly making false statements to Con

  3. 19  gress and the American people and avoiding lawful over

  4. 20  sight in order to obscure the devastating consequences of

  5. 21  his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law and

  6. 22  carry out his statutory dutiesHe has also breached the

  7. 23  public trust by willfully refusing to carry out his statutory

  8. 24  duty to control the border and guard against illegal entry,

012824 E012824.001.xml 91632715January 282024 10:30 a.m.)

(3)AlejandroN.Mayorkasterminatedasylum cooperativeagreementsthatwouldhaveequitablysharedtheburdenofcomplyingwithinternational

page20image541527120

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

20
notwithstanding the calamitous consequences of his abdi

cation of that duty.

Wherefore Alejandro N. Mayorkasby such conduct,

3

  1. 4  hasdemonstratedthathe willremainthreatto national

  2. 5  and border security the safety of the American people ,

  3. 6  andtotheConstitutionifallowedtoremaininoffice,and

  4. 7  has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with his duties

  5. 8  and the rule of lawAlejandro N. Mayorkas thus warrants

  6. 9  impeachment and trialremoval from officeand disquali

10 fication to hold and enjoy any office of honortrustor profit under the UnitedStates.

No comments:

Verstappen

 Remember everyone, he was awarded one victory by the stewards when they changed the rules and took the victory from HAMILTON. Nice he has w...