Merchan

 This piece of shit Judge should be removed from the case as his family is making a profit from this sham as his f**king daughter works for Biden and other liberals. He allows those that are against Trump say anything they wish about him but if Trump responds he is fined and told he will go to jail if it continues.  

We cannily hope for Merchan to fall down and break his f**king leg so he can't continue his law breaking. What ever happened to Freedom Of Speech, forgot, Trump is not allowed to have that, only for those against him. American laws are a joke and we can all see how two sided it is.

Funny

Russia says US support for Ukraine will end as ‘humiliating fiasco’ like ‘Vietnam and Afghanistan’

The Staff: If I remember correctly, Russia ran out of Afghanistan also with its tail between its legs. Wasn't Putin in charge at the time? 

We failed in Nam due to the media claiming we lost and once the public believed, it was over. 

DOIJ

 Department of InJustice

This crap they are doing to We the People by trying Trump on all this Bullshit made up laws (New York) that the federal government would not touch. This should tell everyAmerican Obama/Biden are doing all they can to put Trump in Jail and at the least destroy any opportunity for Americans to select who they wish.

In the old days this would have been settled in a much different way and sometimes I think about what our founding father would say about this. I think Dueling is out now.

Fani in GA is just a piece of trash and has taken money to play while the people of GA stand by. Brag, another Soros puppet along with the crazy judge who is taking freedom of speech any from Trump but everyone else is allowed to say whatever they wish. The piece of trash has a daughter who works for liberals and Obama/Biden but that is ok. What a fu**ing joke he is. 

Smith, hard to say anything about this clown as his history says it all if one looks into him.

America will cease to exist as we have known growing up if Biden/Obama get back in as they are working on destroying this once great country. Hell, Biden doesn't even know how to get off a stage, looks to shake hands when no one is there. He lacks the mental ability to function on his own. Has anyone ever noticed how people lead him around like at a Memory Care Center?   

Erdogan the Dick-Tater

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish president, met Hamas’s leader for talks on Saturday amid reports the terror group was seeking to move its political headquarters from Qatar.

Turkish TV showed Mr Erdogan and Ismail Haniyeh warmly embracing at the meeting in Istanbul, during which they discussed humanitarian assistance to Gaza and sanctions that Ankara recently announced against Israel.

The meeting comes amid reports that Hamas is on the lookout for a new base for its operations abroad after Qatar signalled that it no longer wants to host the group.

The Staff: No surprise here as Erdogan is just a dictator parading as a leader of a free country. The Turkish people use to be free by have since he came to power they are no longer and no such thing as free press. Cross him and you die. Remember he supports Hamas and those who killed babies in ovens and cut their heads off.

What do you Think??????????

 Below are the Articles of Impeachment that the Liberals blew off, read and you decide.

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE H.RES. 863

OFFEREDBYMR. GREENOF TENNESSEE

Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the following

1 That Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas , Secretary of Home 2 land Security of the United States of America , is im

3. 3  peached for high crimes and misdemeanors , and that the

4. 4  following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the

5. 5  United States Senate:

6. 6  Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of

7. 7  Representatives of the United States of America in the

8. 8  name of itself and of the people of the United States of

9. 9  America , against Alejandro N. Mayorkas , Secretary of

10. 10  Homeland Security of the United States of America, in

11 maintenance and support of its impeachment against him

12 for high crimes and misdemeanors .
13 ARTICLE I: WILLFUL AND SYSTEMIC REFUSAL TO COMPLY

14 WITHTHELAW
15 TheConstitutionprovidesthattheHouseofRep 16 resentatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment 17 andthatcivilOfficersoftheUnitedStates,includingthe 18 Secretary of Homeland Security, shall be removed from

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715 ) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

2

1. 1  Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,

2. 2  Bribery,or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors .Inhis

3. 3  conduct while Secretary of Homeland Security,Alejandro

4. 4  N. Mayorkas , in violation of his oath to support and de

5. 5  fend the Constitution of the United States against all en

6. 6  emies,foreign and domestic,to bear true faith and alle

7. 7  giance to the same,and to well and faithfully discharge

8. 8  the duties of his office,has willfully and systemically re

9. 9  fused to comply with Federal immigration laws, in that

10

Throughout his tenure as Secretary of Homeland Se 11 curity , Alejandro N. Mayorkas has repeatedly violated 12 laws enacted by Congress regarding immigration and bor

13. 13  dersecurity.Inlargepartbecauseofhisunlawfulconduct,

14. 14  millions of aliens have illegally entered the United States

15. 15  onanannualbasiswithmanyunlawfullyremaininginthe

16. 16  United States. His refusal to obey the law is not only an

17. 17  offense against the separation of powers in the Constitu

18. 18  tion of the United States, it also threatens our national

19. 19  security and has had a dire impact oncommunities across

20 the country . Despite clear evidence that his willful and

systemic refusal to comply with the law has significantly

22. 22  contributed to unprecedented levels of illegal entrants,the

23. 23  increased control of the Southwest border by drug cartels ,

24. 24  and the imposition of enormous costs on States and local

25 ities affected by the influx of aliens, Alejandro N.

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

23 24 25

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

ceedings and determined to have a credible fear of persecution shall be detained for further consider

ationoftheapplicationforasylum .Insteadofcom ( 91632715)

4

Alejandro N. Mayorkas engaged in this scheme or

5 course of conduct through the following means:

6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21

(1) Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully refused to comply with the detention mandate set forth in sec tion 235(b)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nation

ality Act,requiring that all applicants for admission who are not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted shall be detained for a [removal] pro ceeding Instead of complying with this require ment, Alejandro N. Mayorkas implemented a catch

and release scheme,whereby such aliens areunlaw

fully released,even without effective mechanisms to

ensure appearances before the immigration courts

for removal proceedings or to ensure removal in the case of aliens ordered removed.

(2) Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully refused to comply with the detention mandate set forth in sec tion 235(b)(1)(B)(ii) of such , requiring that an

3

1 Mayorkas has continued in his refusal to comply with the 2 law,and thereby acted to the grave detriment of the inter 3 estsoftheUnitedStates.

22 alienwhoisplacedintoexpeditedremovalpro

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

24 25

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

criminal and terrorism-related grounds shall [be] take n] into custody when the alien is released

( 91632715)

4

1. 1  plying with this requirement ,Alejandro N. Mayorkas

2. 2  implemented a catch and release scheme, whereby

such aliens areunlawfully released,evenwithout ef fective mechanisms to ensure appearances before the

3
4
5 immigration courts for removal proceedings or to en

sure removal in the case of aliens ordered removed .

6

7. 7  (3) Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully refused to

8. 8  comply with the detention set forth in section

9. 9  235(b)(1)(B)(iii)(IV) of such Act,requiring that an

10 alienwhoisplacedintoexpeditedremovalpro

11. 11  ceedingsanddeterminednottohaveacrediblefear

12. 12  of persecution shall be detained until removed .

13. 13  Instead of complying with this requirement ,

14. 14  AlejandroN.Mayorkashasimplementedacatch

15. 15  andreleasescheme,wherebysuchaliensareunlaw

16. 16  fullyreleased,evenwithouteffectivemechanismsto

17. 17  ensureappearancesbeforetheimmigrationcourts

18. 18  forremovalproceedingsortoensureremovalinthe

22 tion236()ofsuch ,requiringthatacriminal 23 alienwhoisinadmissibleordeportableoncertain

case of aliens ordered removed .

19
20 (4)AlejandroN.Mayorkaswillfullyrefusedto 21 complywiththedetentionmandatesetforthinsec

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

23 24 25

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

complywiththedetentionmandatesetforthinsec tion241(a)(2)ofsuchAct,requiringthatanalien ordered removed "shall [be] detain[ed during the

( 91632715)

1

2 3 4 5

6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

5
from law enforcement custody.Instead of complying

with this requirement ,Alejandro N. Mayorkas issued Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigra tion Laws ,which instructs Department of Home

land Security (hereinafter referred to as DHS ) of ficials that the fact an individual is a removable noncitizen should not alone be the basis of an en

forcement action against them and that DHS per sonnel should not rely on the fact of convic

tion alone , even with respect to aliens subject to mandatory arrest and detention pursuant to section 236( ) of such Act,to take them into custody.In Texas v.United States,40 F.4th 205 (2022),the

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded that these guidelines had every indica tion of being a general policy that is so extreme as

17 to amount to an abdication of statutory responsibil

ities and that its replacement of Congress's stat

18 19

22 (5)AlejandroN.Mayorkaswillfullyrefusedto

utory mandates with concerns of equity and race is

20. 20  extralegal[and]plainlyoutsidetheboundsofthe

21. 21  powerconferredbytheINA.

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

6
1 removal period . Instead of complying with this

2 3 4 5

mandate, Alejandro N. Mayorkas issued Guidelines

for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Laws , which instructs DHS officials that the fact an indi

vidual is a removable noncitizen should not alone be

the basis of an enforcement action against them 7 and that DHS "personnel should not rely on the

fact of conviction alone even with respect to

9. 9  aliens subject to mandatory detention and removal

10. 10  pursuanttosection241(a)ofsuchAct.

11. 11  (6)AlejandroN.Mayorkaswillfullyexceeded

12. 12  hisparoleauthoritysetforthinsection212(d)(5)(A)

13. 13  of such Act that permits parole to be granted only

14. 14  on a case-by-case basis , temporarily , and for ur

6

8

15

16

17

gent humanitarian reasons or significant public ben efit ,in that:

(A ) Alejandro N. Mayorkas paroled aliens en masse in order to release them from manda

18
19 tory detention , despite the fact that , as the

20 UnitedStatesCourtofAppealsfortheFifth

21 22 23

Circuit concluded in Texas v. Biden, 20 F.4th 928 (2021), parol[ing] every alien [DHS] cannot detain is the opposite of the case-by-case

24 basis determinations required by law and 25 DHS'spretendedpowertoparolealienswhile

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

6

8 9 10

foreign nationals outside of the United States, including for certain Central American minors,Ukrainians, Venezuelans , Cubans , Haitians,

7

ignoring the limitations Congress imposed on

2. 2  the parole power is] not nonenforcement; it's

3. 3  misenforcement, suspension of the INA, or

4. 4  both

5. 5  (B) Alejandro N. Mayorkas created, re

   opened,or expanded a series of categorical pa

7 role programs never authorized by Congress for

1

11 Nicaraguans,Colombians,Salvadorans,Guate 12 malans,andHondurans,whichenabledhun

dreds of thousands of inadmissible aliens to enter the United States in violation of the laws

enacted by Congress
(7) Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully exceeded

13
14
15
16
17 hisreleaseauthoritysetforthinsection236(a)of

18 19

such Act that permits , in certain circumstances , the release of aliens arrested on an administrative war

20 rant,inthatAlejandroN.Mayorkasreleasedaliens

arrested without a warrant despite their being sub 22 jecttoaseparateapplicablemandatorydetentionre

23 quirementsetforthinsection235(b)(2)ofsuchAct. 24 AlejandroN.Mayorkasreleasedsuchaliensby25 retroactivelyissuingadministrativewarrantsinan

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

21

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

1. 1  attempt to circumvent section 235(b)(2) of such Act.

2. 2  In Florida v. United States, No. 3:21- -1066-TKW

3. 3  ZCB (N.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2023), the United States

   District Court of the Northern District of Florida

5 noted that t his sleight of hand using an arrest

warrant as a de facto release' warrant is adminis

7. 7  trative sophistry at its worst .In addition,the court

8. 8  concluded that what makes DHS's application of

4

6

in this manner unlawful is that

10. 10  235(b)(2),not236(a),governsthedetentionof

11. 11  applicants for admission whom DHS places

12 inremovalproceedingsafterinspection

9

[236(a)]

13
14 to comply with the law has had calamitous consequences 15 for the Nation and the people of the United States,includ 16 ing:
17 (1)Duringfiscalyears2017through 2020,an 18 averageofabout590,000alienseachfiscalyear19 wereencounteredasinadmissiblealiensatportsof

20 entryontheSouthwestborderorapprehendedbe 21 tweenportsofentry.Thereafter,duringAlejandro 22 N.Mayorkas'stenureinoffice,thatnumbersky 23 rocketedtoover1,400,000infiscalyear2021,over

24 2,300,000infiscalyear2022,andover2,400,000in 25 fiscalyear2023.Similarly,duringfiscalyears2017

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

AlejandroN.Mayorkas'swillfulandsystemicrefusal

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22

23 24 25

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

9

1. 1  through 2020, an average of 130,000 persons who

2. 2  were not turned back or apprehended after making

3. 3  an illegal entry were observed along the border each

4. 4  fiscal year. During Alejandro N. Mayorkas's tenure

5. 5  in office, that number more than trebled to 400,000

6. 6  in fiscal year 2021, 600,000 in fiscal year 2022 , and

7. 7  750,000 in fiscal year 2023.

8. 8  (2) American communities both along the

grantedparole,creatingafiscalandhumanitarian crisisanddramaticallydegradingthequalityoflifeof the residents of those communities. For instance, since 2022, more than 150,000 migrants have gone throughNewYorkCity'sshelterintakesystem.In deed,the Mayor of New York City has said that we are past our breaking point and that t his issuewilldestroyNewYorkCity.Infiscalyear2023, NewYorkCityspent$1,450,000,000addressing AlejandroN.Mayorkas'smigrantcrisis,andcityof ficialsfearitwillspendanother$12,000,000,000overthefollowingthreefiscalyears,causingpainful budgetcutstoimportantcityservices.

( 91632715)

Southwest border and across the United States have

9
10 beendevastatedbythedramaticgrowthinillegalen 11 tries,thenumberofaliensunlawfullypresent,and 12 substantialriseinthenumberofaliensunlawfully

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

3 4

6 7

8 9 10

cording to the United Nations's International Orga nization for Migration,the number of migrants in tending to illegally cross our border who have per

ished along the way, either en route to the United States or at the border, almost doubled during the

1

11 tenureofAlejandroN.MayorkasasSecretaryof 12 HomelandSecurity,fromanaverageofabout700

a year during the fiscal years 2017 through 2020, 14 toanaverageofabout1,300ayearduringthefiscal 15 years2021through2023.

16 (4)Aliensmugglingorganizationshavegained

17. 17  tremendouswealthduringAlejandroN.Mayorkas's

18. 18  tenureasSecretaryofHomelandSecurity,with

19. 19  their estimated revenues rising from about

20. 20  $500,000,000 in 2018 to approximately

21. 21  $13,000,000,000in2022

22 (5)DuringAlejandroN.Mayorkas'stenureas 23 SecretaryofHomelandSecurity,theimmigration 24 courtbackloghasmorethandoubledfromabout 25 1,300,000casestoover3,000,000cases.Theex

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

13

10

(3) Alejandro N. Mayorkas's unlawful mass re 2 lease of apprehended aliens and unlawful mass grant

of categorical parole to aliens have enticed an in creasing number of aliens to make the dangerous 5 journey to our Southwest border.Consequently,ac

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

11

1. 1  ploding backlog is destroying the courts ability to

2. 2  administer justice and provide appropriate relief in

3. 3  a timeframe that does not run into years or even

4. 4  decades . As Alejandro N. Mayorkas acknowledged

5. 5  those who have a valid claim to asylum often wait

6. 6  years for a decision; likewise, noncitizens who will

7. 7  ultimately be found ineligible for asylum or other

8. 8  protection which occurs in the majority of cases

9. 9  often have spent many years in the United States

10. 10  priortobeingorderedremoved.Henotedthatof

11. 11  aliensplacedinexpeditedremovalproceedingsand

12. 12  foundtohaveacrediblefearofpersecution,and

13. 13  thusreferredtoimmigrationjudgesforremovalpro

14. 14  ceedings,significantlyfewerthan20percentwere

15. 15  ultimately granted asylum and only 28 percent of

16. 16  casesdecidedontheirmeritsaregrantsofrelief.

17. 17  Alejandro N. Mayorkas also admitted that the fact

    that migrants can wait in the United States for

19 yearsbeforebeingissuedafinalorderdenyingrelief,

20 andthatmanysuchindividualsareneveractually 21 removed,likelyincentivizesmigrantstomakethe

22 journeynorth

18

(6) During Alejandro N. Mayorkas's tenure as Secretary of Homeland Security, approximately

23
24
25 450,000unaccompaniedalienchildrenhavebeenen

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

1

2 3 4 5

7

8 9

12
countered at the Southwest border,and the vast ma

jority have been released into the United States.As a result,there has been a dramatic upsurge in mi grant children being employed in dangerous and ex

ploitative jobs in the United States.
6 (7) Alejandro N. Mayorkas's failure to enforce

18

the law, drawing millions of illegal aliens to the Southwest border, has led to the reassignment of

U.S. Border Patrol agents from protecting the bor

10. 10  derfromillicitdrugtraffickingtoprocessingillegal

11. 11  aliensforrelease.Asaresult,duringAlejandroN.

12. 12  Mayorkas'stenureasSecretaryofHomelandSecu

    rity,the flow of fentanyl across the border and other

14 dangerousdrugs,bothatandbetweenportsof

13

entry, has increased dramatically . U.S. Customs and

15
16
17 poundsoffentanylinfiscalyear2020,approxi

Border

Protection seized approximately 4,800

mately 11,200 pounds in fiscal year 2021, approxi 19 mately14,700poundsinfiscalyear2022,andap

20 proximately27,000poundsinfiscalyear2023.Over 21 70,000Americansdiedfromfentanylpoisoningin 22 2022,andfentanylisnowthenumberonekillerof

Americans between the ages of 18 and 45.

23
24
25 safetybyleavingwideswathsofthebordereffec

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

(8) Alejandro N. Mayorkas has degraded public

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

13

1. 1  tively unpatrolled as U.S. Border Patrol agents are

2. 2  diverted from guarding the border to processing for

3. 3  unlawful release the heightening waves of appre

4. 4  hended aliens (many who now seek out agents for

5. 5  the purpose of surrendering with the now reasonable

6. 6  expectation of being released and granted work au

7. 7  thorization ) , and Federal Air Marshals are diverted

8. 8  from protecting the flying public to assist in such

9. 9  processing

10 (9)DuringAlejandroN.Mayorkas'stenureas

11. 11  SecretaryofHomelandSecurity,theU.S.Border

12. 12  Patrolhasencounteredanincreasingnumberof

    aliens on the terrorist watch list. In fiscal years

14. 14  2017through2020combined,11noncitizensonthe

15. 15  terroristwatchlistwerecaughtattemptingtocross

16. 16  theSouthwestborderbetweenportsofentry.That

17. 17  numberincreasedto15infiscalyear2021,98in

18. 18  fiscalyear2022,169infiscalyear2023,and49so

19. 19  farinfiscalyear2024.

20. 20  Additionally , in United States . Texas , 599 U.S. 670

21 (2023), the United States Supreme Court heard a case

22 involving Alejandro N. Mayorkas's refusal to comply with 23 certain Federal immigration laws that are at issue in this 24 impeachment . The Supreme Court held that States have 25 no standing to seek judicial relief to compel Alejandro N.

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

13

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

14
1 Mayorkas to comply with certain legal requirements con

2. 2  tained in the Immigration and Nationality Act.However,

3. 3  the Supreme Court held that even though the federal

   courts lack Article jurisdiction over this suit,other fo

5. 5  rums remain open for examining the Executive Branch's

6. 6  enforcement policies.For example,Congress possesses an

7. 7  array oftools to analyze and influence those policies [and]

8. 8  those are political checks for the political process .One

9. 9  critical tool for Congress to influence the Executive

10. 10  Branch to comply with the immigration laws of the United

11 States is impeachment . The dissenting Justice noted, 12 The Court holds Texas lacks standing to challenge a fed

13 eral policy that inflicts substantial harm on the State and 14 its residents by releasing illegal aliens with criminal con 15 victions for serious crimes.In order to reach this conclu

16 sion,the Court...holds that the only limit onthe power 17 of a President to disobey a law like the important provi 18 sion at issue is Congress power to employ the weapons 19 of inter-branch warfare .As the dissenting Justice ex

20 plained, Congress may wield what the Solicitor General 21 described as political tools which presumably means

22. 22  things as impeachment and removal Indeed,dur

23. 23  ing oral argument ,the Justice who authored the majority

24. 24  opinion stated to the Solicitor General , I think your posi

25. 25  tion is,instead of judicial review,Congress has to resort

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

15
1 to shutting down the government or impeachment or dra

2 matic steps ". Here, in light of the inability of injured 3 parties to seek judicial relief to remedy the refusal of 4 Alejandro N. Mayorkas to comply with Federal immigra 5 tion laws, impeachment is Congress's only viable option. 6

In all of this, Alejandro N. Mayorkas willfully and

7. 7  systemically refused to comply with the immigration laws,

8. 8  failed to control the border to the detriment of national

9. 9  security, compromised public safety, and violated the rule

10. 10  of law and separation of powers in the Constitution , to

    the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

12

Wherefore Alejandro N. Mayorkas,by such conduct,

13. 13  has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national

14. 14  and border security , the safety of the United States peo

15. 15  ple, and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office,

16. 16  and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with his

17. 17  duties and the rule of law. Alejandro N. Mayorkas thus

18. 18  warrants impeachment and trial,removal from office,and

19. 19  disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor,

20. 20  trust,orprofitundertheUnitedStates.

21. 21  ARTICLEII: BREACHOF PUBLICTRUST

22 TheConstitutionprovidesthattheHouseofRep

23. 23  resentatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment

24. 24  and that civil Officers of the United States,including the

25. 25  Secretary of Homeland Security, shall be removed from

26. 26  Office Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715 ) January 28, 2024 (10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

16
1 Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors . In his

2. 2  conduct while Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro

3. 3  N. Mayorkas, in violation of his oath to well and faithfully

   discharge the duties of his office, has breached the public

5 trust,inthat:

8 the Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter re 9 ferred to as "DHS ), principally to obfuscate the results 10 of his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law.

11 Alejandro N. Mayorkas engaged in this scheme or course 12 of conduct through the following means:

4

has knowingly made false 7 statements , and knowingly obstructed lawful oversight of

6

Alejando N. Mayorkas

13

14

15

16

(1) Alejandro N. Mayorkas knowingly made falsestatementstoCongressthattheborderis se

cure , that the border is no less secure than it was previously,thattheborderis closed,andthat

17 DHShasoperationalcontroloftheborder(as

that term is defined in the Secure Fence Act of 19 2006).

20 (2)AlejandroN.Mayorkasknowinglymade 21 falsestatementstoCongressregardingthescope

22 andadequacyofthevettingofthethousandsofAf 23 ghanswhowereairliftedtotheUnitedStatesand

24 thengrantedparolefollowingtheTalibantakeover

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

18

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

18

22 23

Congress

Additionally , in his conduct while Secretary of Home

1

17
of Afghanistan after President Biden's precipitous

2. 2  withdrawal of United States forces.

3. 3  (3) Alejandro N. Mayorkas knowingly made

4. 4  false statements that apprehended aliens with no

5. 5  legal basis to remain in the United States were

6. 6  being quickly removed.

7. 7  (4) Alejandro N. Mayorkas knowingly made

8. 8  false statements supporting the false narrative that

9. 9  U.S. Border Patrol agents maliciously whipped ille

   gal aliens

10 11 12

13. 13  committees.

14. 14  (6)AlejandroN.Mayorkasdelayedordenied

(5) Alejandro N. Mayorkas failed to comply with multiple subpoenas issued by congressional

access of DHS Office of Inspector General (herein after referred to as OIG ) to DHS records and in

15
16
17 formation , hampering OIG's ability to effectively

perform its vital investigations , audits , inspections ,

19. 19  andotherreviewsofagencyprogramsandoper

20. 20  ationstosatisfytheOIG'sobligationsundersection

21. 21  402(b)oftitle5,UnitedStatesCode,inpart,to

24 land Security, Alejandro N. Mayorkas has breached the 25 public trust by his willful refusal to fulfill his statutory

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

18

1. 1  duty to control and guard the boundaries and borders

2. 2  of the United States against the illegal entry of aliens as set forth in section 103(a)(5) of the Immigration and

4. 4  Nationality Act.Alejandro N. Mayorkas inherited what his

5. 5  first Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol called, arguably the

6. 6  most effective border security in our nation's history

7. 7  Alejandro Mayorkas , however , proceeded to abandon

8. 8  effective border security initiatives without engaging in

9. 9  adequate alternative efforts that would enable DHS to

10. 10  maintain control of the border and guard against illegal

11. 11  entry , and despite clear evidence of the devastating con

12. 12  sequences of his actions, he failed to take action to fulfill

13. 13  his statutory duty to control the border.According to his

14. 14  first Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol, Alejandro N.

15. 15  Mayorkas summarily rejected" the "multiple options to

16. 16  reduce the illegal entries...through proven programs and

17. 17  consequences provided by civil service staff at DHS.De

18. 18  spite clear evidence of the devastating consequences of his

19. 19  actions , he failed to take action to fulfill his statutory duty

20. 20  tocontroltheborder,inthat,amongotherthings:

21 (1)AlejandroN.MayorkasterminatedtheMi 22 grantProtectionProtocols(hereinafterreferredto23 as MPP).InTexasv.Biden,20F.4th928

24 (2021),theUnitedStatesCourtofAppealsforthe 25 Fifth Circuit explained that t]he district

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

2

MPP has contributed to the current border

19
1 court pointed to evidence that the termination of

surge (citing DHS's own previous determinations

4. 4  that MPP had curbed the rate of illegal entries) .

5. 5  The district court had also pointed out that the

3

6 7

8 9

number of enforcement encounters that is, in stances where immigration officials encounter immigrants attempting to cross the southern border with

out documentation had skyrocketed since MPP's

10 termination

(2)AlejandroN.Mayorkasterminatedcon tracts for border wall construction .

11
12
13
14
15
16 asylumaccords.

17. 17  In all of this , Alejandro N. Mayorkas breached the

18. 18  public trust by knowingly making false statements to Con

19. 19  gress and the American people and avoiding lawful over

20. 20  sight in order to obscure the devastating consequences of

21. 21  his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law and

22. 22  carry out his statutory duties. He has also breached the

23. 23  public trust by willfully refusing to carry out his statutory

24. 24  duty to control the border and guard against illegal entry,

g E 012824 E012824.001.xml ( 91632715) January 28, 2024 ( 10:30 a.m.)

(3)AlejandroN.Mayorkasterminatedasylum cooperativeagreementsthatwouldhaveequitablysharedtheburdenofcomplyingwithinternational

G : CMTE HS 18\2DMAJ(R )\ ANS_ART_IM.XML

20
1 notwithstanding the calamitous consequences of his abdi

2 cation of that duty.

Wherefore Alejandro N. Mayorkas, by such conduct,

3

4. 4  hasdemonstratedthathe willremaina threatto national

5. 5  and border security , the safety of the American people ,

6. 6  andtotheConstitutionifallowedtoremaininoffice,and

7. 7  has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with his duties

8. 8  and the rule of law. Alejandro N. Mayorkas thus warrants

9. 9  impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disquali

10 fication to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the UnitedStates.