Tuesday, September 15, 2020

Biden is the WORST Candidate

I have seen democratic candidates since 1968 when I could vote and he is by far the worst. Half the time he can't speak clearly and most of the time he rambles. I feel sorry for him that he is being used by people like Bernie and Harris to further their goals and don't care a bit about him. His wife is right there with those two bottom feeders. Didn't know being the First Lady was that big of a deal to be willing to use her husband knowing how challenged he is.

His use shows just how bad this country has fallen and so many us will do ANYTHING to gain power. They talk about taking our guns if Joe gets in and I remember a women saying she would give them one bullet at at time. I would agree with her and trying to disarm our country is the fastest way to start a civil upraising. We have the 2nd amendment to protect us from a government trying to take over from the people. If some republican tried to do this, they would have the same civil unrest. We the People WILL NOT surrender our right to have guns.

Should the court be stacked against the American people and attempt to take our freedoms, just remember the PELICAN BRIEF as I am sure we would see this first hand. The movie "V" should remind all that "GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE AFRAID OF THE PEOPLE". All the clowns in Washington need to remember, they work for US or supposed to. 

Beware liberals and any republican who wishes to take our freedoms, We the People will fight if backed into a corner so be VERY careful. 

Sunday, September 13, 2020

LA Police Shootings and all Police Shooting need to STOP

Enough folks as it is now time for We the People to be ready and armed to assist when needed to protect our officers from the TRASH that needs to be removed. I saw the video of the punk gutless piece of crap who shot those officers. I then heard some protesters block their arrival at the hospital and shouted for them to die.

Will get removed probably for this but we need to be ready to go to any hospital where an officer who has been shot by this gutless trash is taken. Any crowd that attempts to block their entry into the hospital needs to be moved one way or another. If the crowd wishes to be there blocking, help make them a patient there also. It is now time for the silent majority to TAKE THE TRASH OUT.

Those are not people protesting but trash who wish to bring the downfall of our country. If it is so bad here, GET THE F--K OUT and let us who wish to live in peace and become ONE American people where color is a distant memory. 

Arm yourself and be ready as my father told me to do over 50 years ago. Now I have to say "Dad, you were right". 

Sunday, September 6, 2020

Either Party Could do This

An example of how Democrats harvest votes

Democrats are pushing the notion of mail-in voting, hoping the unsuspecting will think it’s just an extension of absentee voting. It’s not. 
It’s a means to facilitate voter fraud—also known of “harvesting votes”.
It’s widely acknowledged that harvesting votes brought JFK into the win column in Illinois when thousands of Chicago votes magically appeared for Senator Kennedy, from vapor. Nixon, somewhat to his credit, did not dispute the count.

Remember and Protect America

Have You Forgotten:  This week we commemorate the 9-11 terrorist act against America.  As most Americans mourn and remember...others have forgotten.  Share this video.

Unfortunately the external threats to our country have now moved to internal terrorists who hate America and the American idea as much as those terrorists did.


Elect Biden and Riots Stop:  Now former Vice President Biden and liberal Democrat allies say if we elect Biden in 2020 he will bring peace and reconciliation to our country?  Somehow he and President Obama in 8 years were NOT able to create an acceptable system of “social justice”  when they controlled the White House...but now will be different?!?

A couple of problems:

First, talk about your classic Mafia-like extortion of American voters.  If you vote for Biden, we will stop the “resist” movement’s riots and looting and bring reconciliation and peace to your neighborhoods.  Extortion used to be illegal.

Second, the rioting and looting that the Democrats unleashed in their “resist” movement is kind of like the genie you let out of the bottle and can’t get back in.  They have lost control of their managed chaos.

Third, Marxist Antifa and Black Live Matter organizations have taken advantage of legitimate calls for social justice and are advocating an all out revolution to overthrow our form of government.  They openly say they want to destroy capitalism, defund police, kill police officers and “white people” while chanting “Death to America.”  The crazy left is now organized and are dangerously manipulating legitimate protesters around the country.

Don’t let the Democrats blackmail you into voting for Biden!

Don’t believe their duplicitous campaign ads.  Listen to what is being said on the streets.  No reason NOT to believe the rioters.  They are telling us EXACTLY what they want to do.

Don’t let candidates who don’t respect the rule of law bully you into voting for them.

America has thrived partly because it relies on the rule of law to create a level playing field.  There is no doubt we need to do better, but there is no greater country in the world, with greater opportunity for all than America!

P.S. Is there a reason “demonstrators” have to demonstrate at night and not during the day?  That seems to help their “rioter” friends who wear hard hats, carry bats and start fires?  Just asking.

Mail-In Voting Fraud Set-Up:  Bloomberg’s Hawkfish political firm has “warned” of a Trump landslide that isn’t?!?  Yes, they are making an argument that Trump could win on election day but thousands or maybe millions of legitimate and fraudulent mail-in ballots could change the results.  Read the article below.

At a time of such political division in our country, creating a scenario and encouraging a mail-in system of voting without protections to protect against fraud isn’t helpful.  They are creating an excuse to challenge the election.

The progressive left didn’t “accept” President Trump’s victory last time and are now trying to set up the narrative to “resist” again if Trump wins re-election.

States that have used mail-in voting took years to create a system that insured the integrity of the system.  Anyone who wants to vote by mail can request an absentee ballot, that has safeguards to protect against fraud.  But the mass mail-in voting scheme Democrats have pushed around the country is dangerous and a threat to our democracy and the peaceful transfer of power that makes America unique in this world.

Love It or Leave It: You have to admit that it's “funny” that Democrat Mayors are “relocating” due to “peaceful protests”.  Just let that sink in for a minute.

Three Questions for Liberals: There are three question that would destroy most of the arguments on the left:

  1. Compared to what?
  2. At what costs?
  3. What hard evidence do you have?

"There are very few ideas on the left that can pass all three of those kinds of things."
-Thomas Sowell

Protests vs Riots - But Mostly Peaceful: “Right to Peaceably Assemble” is granted. “Right to  Vandalize, Destroy Public & Private Property, Assault, Injure, Kill, Inflict Fear, Public Nuisance & Hide - These & Other Criminal Behaviors Under the Cover of Angry Mobs” is not.

The problem is innocent people, families and private businesses, who had NOTHING to do with police shootings or excessive force are being targeted and terrorized by arsonists, vandals, looters and rioters.

Obamagate: The weaponization of both domestic and foreign intelligence against a presidential campaign from a sitting administration solely for political purposes to prevent the smooth transition of power and weaken his presidency to limit his legislative successes.

That’s what Obamagate is all about...they spied, they lied and tried to cover it up.

This should NEVER happen to ANY American...there should be bipartisan outrage!!!

Friday, September 4, 2020

Woman Viciously Assaults Child Over His Trump Sign, Police Say

Police in Boulder, Colorado, are searching for a woman who allegedly assaulted a child during an altercation over a sign in support of President Donald Trump.
The reported crime occurred earlier this week when a 12-year-old was riding his bicycle while carrying a Trump campaign sign.
KMGH-TV in Denver reported the boy was attacked while riding the bike near the intersection of Folsom Street and Glenwood Drive in the city.
The boy’s father, Jesse Rosales, told police his son was riding with the sign when the woman turned around in her vehicle and told the boy, “You want something to look at?”
That’s when police say the woman became violent, per a report obtained by the outlet. Police said the suspect began punching the boy in the back of the head and on his arms with a closed fist. She also allegedly scratched him.
Per the police report, the woman then attempted to steal the Trump sign, which the child was using as a shield.
Prior to the attack, the boy told police, the woman stared and laughed at him. In an interview with KMGH, the 12-year-old expressed fear and disappointment at being attacked by an adult over a political sign.
“I didn’t want any conflict, anything,” the child said. “I just wanted to show what I believe in.”
The boy added, “Just don’t attack people, ’cause what she did to me — that’s not OK.”
He told the outlet he has been attacked before over his support for the president, but never by an adult.
Rosales told KMGH he would like to locate the woman so he can file criminal charges against her.

The alleged attacker was described as a white woman in her late 20s to mid-30s with blondish-brown shoulder-length hair. The boy said she was riding a gray/blue moped and wearing a tan jacket and blue jeans.
The Republican National Committee issued a statement about the repor The party asked Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden to “disavow this act of hatred and violence on a child.”
The statement was also directed at Colorado Democrats.
The Staff: Now we have adults beating up children who wish freedom and have learned government control is not what Made American Great. We the People and President Trump will "Make America Great" once again as the Covid-19 disappears. 

Thursday, September 3, 2020

LIBERALS WILL HATE THIS & THE MEDIA WILL NEVER REPORT IT

Stick with me here—I am not resorting to spoon-fed talking points from the Trump War Room. This assessment was made from the details and advice dispensed from medical professionals—experts in their field—and were found not in arcane community college opinion papers but from the highest reaches of our media complex. 
Donald Trump, the administration, and the Covid-19 Task Force have done amazingly successful work in response to the coronavirus and dealing with it on a national scale.
First, let’s deliver a few items the press has been working at keeping a lid on in 2020. Despite claims to the contrary, the Trump administration had undertaken a number of steps early to address the spread of Covid-19 in the states. He put in place a travel ban from China, he formed the Coronavirus Task Force, and he worked with businesses to begin ramping up production of needed medical supplies for healthcare workers. There were also a number of executive orders passed to tear down government restrictions that blocked businesses from manufacturing products outside their designed purpose. 
These are laid out to show that the initial narrative we heard from the media of the president “doing nothing for 70 days” was completely false. The press has been adept at selling false narratives during this pandemic. As just one example, recall the hysteria months back over ventilators. We were told there was a national shortfall, that the president was lax in addressing the problem—while he was getting businesses to work on production—and that Trump was possibly restricting deliveries to certain states over political squabbling. New York was said to be in dire need of 40,000 of the devices and was woefully short.

As Mike Pence noted during the GOP convention, not a single patient in need of a ventilator was denied the use of one due to lack of availability. Not long after the press was blaring about the ventilator crisis something began to take place the press barely addressed. States began sending their surplus ventilators to areas in need, as the promised overflow of patients to ERs across the country did not materialize. Those 40,000 New York was lacking in dire fashion? The state began donating its surplus machines to Mexico after employing just a few thousand. 
This sets up the practice of the media during this crisis. Note that as the ventilator crisis ebbed we were never delivered the same breathless reporting over the success. There were one of either two explanations for this and possibly both apply. Either the administration acted quick enough and met the demand—something the press would never dare detail—or the hysteria of the need was completely overblown, something to which the press would never admit. These traits also play out regarding the projections we had been delivered and today’s Covid realities. One of the early and loudest accusations from the press concerning Trump’s reaction to the pandemic was his refusal to listen to medical experts on the matter. With this charge in mind, we can go back and listen to what those medical experts told us, as delivered by the properly attentive media complex.
Back in March, the Director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota declared that he was estimating Covid deaths in the U.S. would be approaching the 500,000 plateau. As we are about to see, this was one of the more rosy predictions by the experts.
As the coronavirus reached our borders and began to entrench itself in our society the epidemiologists and virologists looked into the spread and began to deduce what we need to do and what could possibly transpire. In March the media’s favorite practitioner, Dr. Anthony Fauci testified to Congress that coronavirus was ten times more lethal than the flu, with a mortality rate around 1%. Another source the press adores, the World Health Organization, had placed that rate even higher, at 3-4%. Dire figures, to be sure. 
Congress has its own medical professional who weighed in on the matter, Dr. Brian Monahn. At the time of Dr. Fauci’s hearing in March, Dr. Monahan projected that up to one-third of the country was expected to contract the virus. Based on the lethality this meant that we could be facing close to 1 million deaths in the United States. Chilling to consider, but these prognostications were not outliers.
A short time after Fauci’s testimony, The New York Times had a report detailing the projections from Dr. Neil M. Ferguson, a British epidemiologist. Dr. Ferguson is regarded as the preeminent source on disease outbreak modeling. He looked at probable and possible influences and came up with high-and-low end estimates to what the United States was likely to face. He stated there was a possibility of 2.2 million deaths, in his worst-case scenario. But this was a scare figure, based on what may occur with little action taken. The press, however, latched on to this number, and used it to bludgeon President Trump.
But the Times also asked the doctor about the best-case result. Based on factors such as a summer lull, a possible mutation of the virus, and some herd immunity taking effect, if all went well the U.S. would ‘”only” see about 1.1 million deaths. This estimate was based on the factors already in place and the steps that had been taken at that time.
Tellingly there was another highly regarded source coming out with similar figures. Andrew Slavitt is a former Obama administration official who was the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  Slavitt came forward with death rate figures more glaring. Slavitt was involved in a series of conferences with teams of medical professionals looking into the outbreak and assessing what would take place. The panel ran scenarios where they declared containment was no longer a possibility. They projected higher infection estimates, where they saw 40-70 percent of the U.S. population becoming infected, leading to at minimum 1.5 million deaths, and reaching to 2 million, or higher, if the virus could not be controlled. Slavitt promised cities across the country would be “overrun” with cases they could not handle.
To repeat, these are all the people the press has told us that we NEED to listen to, medical experts trained specifically in the field of epidemiology and other related viral fields. These are the minds we have been lectured about paying serious attention to in this crisis. So I am paying attention. We were assured that 1 million deaths in this country was possibly the best hoped-for result.
To date we are still below 200,000 Covid-related deaths, with the curve flattening rapidly. We have gotten past the worst stage of the outbreak and we stand at roughly 20 percent of the assured figure that had been delivered from various expert sources. This has to be regarded as good news, comparatively speaking.
That will never be the judgement from the press. Either Trump has done a better job at handling this crisis, or the press had overblown what they described as lax action taken early on, leading to these error-prone estimates. The only accurate prediction we can make today is the media continuing to disseminate inaccurate details on the pandemic.

Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Want an Education - Read the Below if you have the courage

I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august occasion. It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to impress you; you'll have enough smoke blown your way today. And you can bet your tassels I'm not here to impress the faculty and administration.

You may not like much of what I have to say, and that's fine. You will remember it though. Especially after about 10 years out there in the real world. This, it goes without saying, does not apply to those of you who will seek your careers and your fortunes as government employees.

This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old saying that those who can - do. Those who can't - teach. That sounds deliciously insensitive. But there is often raw truth in insensitivity, just as you often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in compassion. Say good-bye to your faculty because now you are getting ready to go out there and do. These folks behind me are going to stay right here and teach.

By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma doesn't mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed me my private pilot's license many years ago, he said, 'Here, this is your ticket to learn.' The same can be said for your diploma. Believe me, the learning has just begun.

Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact, you are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much. You feel so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a compassionate and caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just so extraordinarily special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any to be a Liberal; as good a time as any to know absolutely everything. You have plenty of time, starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in. Over the next few years, as you begin to feel the cold breath of reality down your neck, things are going to start changing pretty fast .. including your own assessment of just how much you really know.

So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality: Pay attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then compare the words of the left to the words and phrases you hear from those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups --The Blacks, The Poor, The Rich, The Disadvantaged, The Less Fortunate. From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.

That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives and Libertarians think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual.

Liberals feel that their favored groups, have enforceable rights to the property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives (and Libertarians, myself among them I might add) think that individuals have the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses.

In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at your diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on them. Not the name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or sorority, butyourname. Your group identity is going away. Your recognition and appreciation of your individual identity starts now.

If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself to be a libertarian or a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can and apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open arms. They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed an individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign on to the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.

Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your eyes. You're going to actually get a full time job! You're also going to get a lifelong work partner. This partner isn't going to help you do your job. This partner is just going to sit back and wait for payday. This partner doesn't want to share in your effort, just your earnings.

Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent; an agent representing a strange and diverse group of people. An agent for every teenager with an illegitimate child. An agent for a research scientist who wanted to make some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys grind their teeth. An agent for some poor aging hippie who considers herself to be a meaningful and talented artist ... but who just can't manage to sell any of her artwork on the open market.

Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any, job skills; for every person who ignored all offered educational opportunities, dreaming of nothing more than a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn dictators in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign aid. An agent for multi-million-dollar companies who want someone else to pay for their overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who wants to use the unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal enrichment and benefit.

That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive Imperial Federal Government. Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power this agent has. Power that you do not have. A power that no individual has, will have or should have. This agent has the legal power to use force – deadly force – to accomplish its goals.

You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to you, introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill out, and move right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton gorilla with a gun. It will sleep anywhere it wants to.

Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become successful it will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm sorry, there just isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder, and you can't decrease it's share of your income. That power rests with him, not you.

So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong to fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise government for government is inherently evil. Oh yes, I know it's a necessary evil, but it is dangerous nonetheless ... somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that in the proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can be fatal.

Now – let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds at this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon as possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but they fail miserably out there in the real world.

First – that favorite buzz word of the media, government and academia: Diversity!

You have been taught that the real value of any group of people - be it a social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever - is based on diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because diversity is based not on an individual's abilities or character, but on a person's identity and status as a member of a group. Yes – it's that liberal group identity thing again.

Within the great diversity movement group identification - be it racial, gender based, or some other minority status - means more than the individual's integrity, character or other qualifications.

Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere where diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual achievement and excellence actually count. No matter what your professors have taught you over the last four years, you are about to learn that diversity is absolutely no replacement for excellence, ability, and individual hard work.

From this day on every single time you hear the word "diversity" you can rest assured that there is someone close by who is determined to rob you of every vestige of individuality you possess.

We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We have witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last few decades, usually emanating from college campuses.

You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place to live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The right to an education. You probably even have your own pet right - the right to a Beemer, for instance, or the right to have someone else provide for that child you plan on downloading in a year or so.

Forget it. Forget those rights! I'll tell you what your rights are! You have a right to live free, and to whatever wealth you are able to produce with your labor. I'll also tell you have no right to any portion of the life or labor of another.

You may think, for instance, that you have a right to health care. After all, Hillary said so, didn't she? But you cannot receive health care unless some doctor or health practitioner surrenders some of his time - his life - to you. He may be willing to do this for compensation, but that's his choice. You have no "right" to his time or property. You have no right to his or any other person's life or to any portion thereof.

You may also think you have some "right" to a job; a job with a living wage, whatever that is. Do you mean to tell me that you have a right to force your services on another person, and then the right to demand that this person compensate you with their money? I can't wait for you to point that one out for me in our Constitution. I sure would like to be a fly on the wall when some urban outdoorsmen (that would be "homeless person" for those of you who don't want to give these less fortunate people a romantic and adventurous title) came to you and demanded his job and your money.

The people who have been telling you about all the rights you have are simply exercising one of theirs - the right to be imbeciles. Their being imbeciles didn't cost anyone else either property or time. It's their right, and they exercise it brilliantly.

By the way, did you catch my use of the phrase "less fortunate" a bit ago when I was talking about the urban outdoorsmen? That phrase is a favorite of the Left. Think about it, and you'll understand why.

To imply that one person is homeless, destitute, dirty, drunk, spaced out on drugs, unemployable, and generally miserable because he is "less fortunate" is to imply that a successful person - one with a job, a home and a future - is in that position because he or she was "fortunate." The dictionary says that fortunate means "having derived good from an unexpected place." There is nothing unexpected about deriving good from hard work. There is also nothing unexpected about deriving misery from choosing drugs, alcohol, and the street instead of education and personal responsibility.

If the Left can create the common perception that success and failure are simple matters of "fortune" or "luck," then it is easy to promote and justify their various income redistribution schemes. After all, we are just evening out the odds a little bit, aren't we?

This "success equals luck" idea the liberals like to push is seen everywhere. Democratic presidential candidate Richard Gephardt refers to high-achievers as "people who have won life's lottery." He wants you to believe they are making the big bucks because they are lucky; all they did was buy the right lottery ticket. What an insult this is to the man or woman who works that 60 hour week to provide for a family.

It's not luck, my friends. It's choice. One of the greatest lessons I ever learned was in a book by Og Mandino, entitled "The Greatest Secret in the World." The lesson? Very simple: "Use wisely your power of choice."

That bum sitting on a heating grate, smelling like a wharf rat? He's there by choice. He is there because of the sum total of the choices he has made in his life. This truism is absolutely the hardest thing for some people to accept, especially those who consider themselves to be victims of something or other - victims of discrimination, bad luck, the system, capitalism, whatever. After all, nobody really wants to accept the blame for his or her position in life. Not when it is so much easier to point and say, "Look! He did this to me!" than it is to look into a mirror and say, "You S.O.B.! You did this to me!"

The key to accepting responsibility for your life is to accept the fact that your choices, every one of them, are leading you inexorably to either success or failure, however you define those terms.

Some of the choices are obvious: Whether or not to stay in school. Whether or not to get pregnant. Whether or not to hit the bottle. Whether or not to keep this job you hate until you get another better-paying job. Whether or not to save some of your money, or saddle yourself with huge payments for that new car.

Some of the choices are seemingly insignificant: Whom to go to the movies with. Whose car to ride home in. Whether to watch the tube tonight, or read a book on investing. But, and you can be sure of this, each choice counts. Each choice is a building block - some large, some small. But each one is a part of the structure of your life. If you make the right choices, or if you make more right choices than wrong ones, something absolutely terrible may happen to you. Something unthinkable. You, my friend, could become one of the hated, the evil, the ugly, the feared, the filthy, the successful, the rich.

Quite a few people have followed that tragic path.

The rich basically serve two purposes in this country. First, they provide the investments, the investment capital, and the brains for the formation of new businesses. Businesses that hire people. Businesses that send millions of paychecks home each week to the un-rich.

Second, the rich are a wonderful object of ridicule, distrust, and hatred. Few things are more valuable to a politician than the envy most Americans feel for the evil rich.

Envy is a powerful emotion. Even more powerful than the emotional minefield that surrounded Bill Clinton when he reviewed his last batch of White House interns. Politicians use envy to get votes and power. And they keep that power by promising the envious that the envied will be punished: "The rich will pay their fair share of taxes if I have anything to do with it.'

The truth is that the top 10% of income earners in this country pays almost 50% of all income taxes collected. I shudder to think what these job producers would be paying if our tax system were any more "fair."

You have heard, no doubt, that in America the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Interestingly enough, our government's own numbers show that many of the poor actually get richer, and that quite a few of the rich actually get poorer. But for the rich who do actually get richer, and the poor who remain poor ... there's an explanation -- a reason. The rich, you see, keep doing the things that make them rich; while the poor keep doing the things that make them poor.

Speaking of the poor, during your adult life you are going to hear an endless string of politicians bemoaning the plight of the poor in America. So, you need to know that under our government's definition of "poor" you can have a $5 million net worth, a $300,000 home and a new $90,000 Mercedes, all completely paid for. You can also have a maid, cook, and valet, and $1 million in your checking account, and you can still be officially defined by our government as "living in poverty." Now there's something you haven't seen on the evening news.

How does the government pull this one off? Very simple, really. To determine whether or not some poor soul is "living in poverty," the government measures one thing -- just one thing. Income. It doesn't matter one bit how much you have, how much you own, how many cars you drive or how big they are, whether or not your pool is heated, whether you winter in Aspen and spend the summers in the Bahamas, or how much is in your savings account. It only matters how much income you claim in that particular year. This means that if you take a one-year leave of absence from your high-paying job and decide to live off the money in your savings and checking accounts while you write the next great American novel, the government says you are 'living in poverty."

This isn't exactly what you had in mind when you heard these gloomy statistics, is it?

Do you need more convincing? Try this. The government's own statistics show that people who are said to be "living in poverty" spend more than $1.50 for each dollar of income they claim. Something is a bit fishy here. just remember all this the next time Peter Jennings puffs up and tells you about some hideous new poverty statistics.

And please remember this: The average person in this country described as "poor" has a higher standard of living than the average European. Not the average "poor" European, the average European.

Why has the government concocted this phony poverty scam? Because the government needs an excuse to grow and to expand its social welfare programs, which translates into an expansion of its power. If the government can convince you, in all your compassion,that the number of "poor" is increasing, it will have all the excuse it needs to sway an electorate suffering from the advanced stages of Obsessive-Compulsive Compassion Disorder.

Well, it looks like I'm about to be given the hook. The faculty looks a little angry. I'll bet they've already changed their minds about that honorary degree I was going to get.That's OK, though. I still have my Ph.D. in Insensitivity from the Neal Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training. I learned that, in short, sensitivity sucks. It's a trap. Think about it - the truth knows no sensitivity. Life can be insensitive. Wallow too much in sensitivity and you'll be unable to deal with life, or the truth. So, get over it.

Now, before the dean has me shackled and hauled off, I have a few random thoughts. 
·  You need to register to vote, unless you are on welfare. If you are living off the efforts of others, please do us the favor of sitting down and shutting up until you are on your own again. To the welfare class I say that we're taking care of you we would appreciate if if you would just stay out of our way so we can get the job done. 
·  When you do vote, your votes for the House and the Senate are more important than your vote for president. The House controls the purse strings, so concentrate your awareness there. 
·  Liars cannot be trusted, even when the liar is the president of the United States. If someone can't deal honestly with you, send them packing. 
·  Don't bow to the temptation to use the government as an instrument of plunder. If it is wrong for you to take money from someone else who earned it -- to take their money by force for your own needs -- then it is certainly just as wrong for you to demand that the government step forward and do this dirty work for you. 
·  Don't look in other people's pockets. You have no business there. What they earn is theirs. What your earn is yours. Keep it that way. Nobody owes you anything, except to respect your privacy and your rights, and leave you the hell alone. 
·  Speaking of earning, the revered 40-hour workweek is for losers. Forty hours should be considered the minimum, not the maximum. You don't see highly successful people clocking out of the office every afternoon at five. The losers are the ones caught up in that afternoon rush hour. The winners drive home in the dark. 
·  Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection. 
·  Finally (and aren't you glad to hear that word), as Og Mandino wrote,

1. Proclaim your rarity. Each of you is a rare and unique human being.

2. Use wisely your power of choice.

3. Go the extra mile ... drive home in the dark.

Oh, and put off buying a television set as long as you can.

Now, if you have any idea at all what's good for you, you will get the hell out of here and never come back.

Class dismissed.



The Staff: I have kept this for years since Neal gave this address and still very true

WE NEED NEAL

Where Neal Boortz hiding? America needs his voice during these times more than ever. If someone speaks to him, let him know the Boortz Army is ready for his insight every day or once a week however he can help. 

WE MISS YOU NEAL

Is Civil War Coming???????????

Can American Citizens Save the Government of the People?
The blood on the streets is crying out to the American people. How far will the killings go? Will the bloodshed push Americans beyond the tipping point into open armed civil war? Over the past week and weekend, blood was shed in clashes between Antifa and BLM terrorists and citizens who have had enough of the looting, burning and destroying businesses in the nation’s cities, not to mention the lame or zero responses by Leftist, Democrat leaders in Democrat-controlled cities and states. Additionally, the Leftists that showed up in D.C. forming angry mobs and harassing the people who were leaving the White House after the final night of the Republican National Convention, shows so little class that whoever planned it must have no moral clarity or dignity.

VOTE TRUMP AND HELP THEM PULL THE LEVER

What If Democrats Lose?
The Democrats sense they are going to lose this election. There are stark indications. First, Biden is nowhere to be found. He hides in his basement being hidden from reality by watching CNN. Then Hillary tells Biden not to concede the election under any circumstances and then Pelosi advises Biden not to debate Trump, “It will only legitimize Trump as President and give Trump an opportunity to make you look bad.”
There are also reports that the Democrats are going to cheat in Trump’s favor so as to report that Trump is conducting a fraudulent election. They can prove it, of course, because they did it.

Is this True??????????


Joe Biden & Democrats Are in Reality, Antifa
Thanks to a major exposé of the enterprising San Francisco News, comes stunning information that the antifa.com website—takes you directly to the homepage of joebiden.com.
As Catholic priest Fr. John Zuhlsdorf (Fr. Z), a sort of Fr. Brown, in real life advises, type in antifa.com and see for yourself.:

If you Don't Like America, She is Pointing the Way Out

The Democrats' Mental Problem


I placed this here for Antifa and all the other rioters

Nancy Pelosi seen without mask inside San Francisco hair salon

The most powerful elected US Democrat, Nancy Pelosi, has visited a hair salon in San Francisco, breaking rules that only allow service outdoors, in order to control the spread of coronavirus.
Ms Pelosi was also seen with a face mask around her neck rather than over her mouth. She has criticised President Donald Trump for not wearing a mask.
A spokesman said she did not realize she (liar) was breaking her home city's rules.
Mr Trump said she was being "decimated" after lecturing everyone else.
Thousands of California businesses have shut as part of measures to fight coronavirus.
The footage obtained by Fox News showed the House of Representatives speaker inside the premises of eSalon on Monday.
A stylist, who was wearing a mask, was shown following her.
Mrs Pelosi - who always wears masks in public - often admonishes Republicans to "listen to the science" on the pandemic.
Defending her visit, spokesman Drew Hammill said in a statement: "This business offered for the Speaker to come in on Monday and told her they were allowed by the city to have one customer at a time in the business."
"The Speaker complied with the rules as presented to her by this establishment."
Mrs Pelosi has herself previously cited US Centers for Disease Control guidelines recommending that Americans wear face masks in public, especially when physical distancing measures are difficult.
After Monday's appointment, the House speaker appeared on MSNBC with the Golden Gate Bridge in the background.
She (botox _itch) told the network that Mr Trump had "slapped science right in the face" last week by allowing an audience of mainly mask-less invitees on the White House lawn to watch his speech to the Republican convention.  
The salon owner, Erica Kious, told Fox News she rents chairs to a stylist, who notified her that Mrs Pelosi's assistant had called, saying her boss wanted to come in for a wash and blow dry.
Ms Kious told the cable network: "It was a slap in the face that she went in, you know, that she feels that she can just go and get her stuff done while no one else can go in, and I can't work."
More than 5,000 businesses in the San Francisco Bay area alone have closed since March, over 2,000 of them permanently, during the pandemic, according to a recent study of Yelp data.
Outdoor haircuts were allowed in California from Tuesday, under new rules announced by the mayor, but indoor salons remain shut.
Senate Republicans suggested the House speaker was a hypocrite.
They tweeted: "Speaker Pelosi has pushed policies that would keep our economy closed and our small businesses shut down.
"But for herself? A salon visit whenever she pleases."
The House speaker has previously said Republicans could help create the conditions to safely reopen if they would only "listen to the scientists".
Mrs Pelosi has also repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to largely spurn face coverings, calling him a "coward" and saying: "Real men wear masks."
The US president reminded the speaker of her statements, vowing to win the House in elections in November.

And he praised the salon owner for "turning her in".
The coronavirus outbreak has infected more than six million people in the US, while some 185,000 deaths have been recorded.

The Staff: Shows what a double standard there is for this type of person. Does anyone remember stuffing her fat face with Ice Cream in front of her multi-thousand frig.. She doesn't believe the rest of us are on equal footing as the clown is.

Joe Rambles Again, Nothing new

Twitter users circulated several portions of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's speech from Pittsburgh on Monday, causing the words "Biden video" to trend on the platform.

While the former vice president was hailed and criticized over policy, one excerpt where Biden appeared incoherent sparked concern among users who claimed the flub went beyond "stumbling over words."
What are the details?

In the video, the 77-year-old Biden says, "COVID has taken this year — just since the outbreak — has taken 100 year. Look, here's...the lives...it's just...I mean, think about it. More lives this year than any other year for the past 100 years."

One of President Donald Trump's sons, Eric Trump, shared the footage online, claiming, "This is why the Biden campaign doesn't want him to leave his basement — this guy isn't playing with a full deck and it is so irresponsible that the media covers this up..."

Republican activist Brandon Straka, a former liberal and co-founder of the WalkAway movement reacted, "OMG. This isn't a mispronunciation or stumbling over a few words. This is really bad."

Another user asserted, "It's dementia. I've seen it up close, as a lot of us have, sadly. I can't understand why Jill Biden is allowing this to continue." 
And another said, "It's even worse when you see it written down...." 
Someone else stated, "Would anyone let this man handle their checkbook. He is incapacitated. I really don't think he will make it to the election. His family needs to stop this. It's truly sad."

One person replied, "Slip ups are funny but this is watching someone struggle. I just can't see how he could do a debate at this point."

What did Trump critics say?
But Trump critics also weighed in, with one responding to Eric Trump, "Why was your Dad rushed to the hospital recently? Why is he having difficulty walking and why does he keep slurring his speech? Did your Dad have a stroke? This is what the American people want to know!" 
Another wrote, "Yeah, that's awkward. Funny thing is though, Biden is STILL the better choice."

Biden has been dogged by concerns over his gaffes for years, but has faced increased scrutiny both during the primary campaign and general election over his frequent stumbles during speeches. His defenders have attributed the slips to the stutter the former vice president had as a child.
In an interview with The Daily Hayes, Risch cited the evidence found by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, a family doctor from Monroe, New York, who has reported having a 99.7% survival rate for his patients using hydroxychloroquine. 

Zelenko emphasized that the high success rate using hydroxychloroquine is effected when administered on an outpatient basis and in the early stages, usually within the first five days of experiencing symptoms.  He spoke of how it was imperative to follow a strict protocol, which included using a cocktail containing hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and the antibiotic azithromycin.  

Doctors across the country have been coming forward and telling of their positive experience of high success rates when treating patients having the Wuhan virus with hydroxychloroquine. 

Dr. Simone Gold, a board-certified emergency room physician, recently stood with a group of other physicians on the Supreme Court's steps and stated, "We brought together physicians from across the country who have successfully treated patients using hydroxychloroquine. Our message to the American people is clear.  Hydroxychloroquine works."
Gold asked why state governors are restricting physicians from prescribing a medication approved by the FDA for 65 years and empowering pharmacies to overrule how doctors want to treat their patients.  "These actions are unprecedented and have never happened before in medicine," said Gold.
Even with all of the published evidence and patient testimonials that hydroxychloroquine is a safe, inexpensive ($20–$50 per full treatment) drug that saves lives, the FDA pulled its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).  The FDA somehow determined that hydroxychloroquine is unlikely to be effective in treating the Wuhan virus. 

The FDA instead gave the coveted EUA to the drug Remdesivir.  Remdesivir is listed as an investigational drug where the safety and efficacy for the treatment of the Wuhan virus are not yet known.  The approximate treatment cost to patients is $3,000.

The FDA also stated that hydroxychloroquine posed serious cardiac adverse events and other potentially dangerous side-effects. 
"Not true," said Risch, who emphasized the FDA's failure to follow the critical protocol when it issued that warning. 

Zelenko said the adverse cardiac events mentioned by the FDA were found in patients treated inside a hospital and in the later stages of the disease.  According to Zelenko, top electrophysiologists (doctors who specialize in heart rhythm problems) said they did not see any of the cardiac issues mentioned by the FDA in outpatient settings.  They did find some cardiac items in the hospital settings but that it was unclear if hydroxychloroquine or an already damaged heart from the virus was the cause. 

Information on the life-saving abilities of hydroxychloroquine will soon be almost impossible to find as tech companies have censored any positive discussion of the drug.  YouTube took down Zelenko's pro-hydroxychloroquine video, saying it violated community guidelines.  Twitter removed a tweet by Rudy Giuliani that said hydroxychloroquine is "100% effective" in treating the Wuhan virus.  

Dr. Gold stated, "Facebook removed the livestream of our conference that had 15 million views.  Twitter forced us to delete video testimonials from our physicians, and our web host removed our website and claimed a 'violation of their TOS.'" 

Gold, who added, "The media smeared us with lies and falsehoods," was fired from her position.


This isn't a mispronunciation or stumbling over a few words.'



Twitter users circulated several portions of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's speech from Pittsburgh on Monday, causing the words "Biden video" to trend on the platform.

While the former vice president was hailed and criticized over policy, one excerpt where Biden appeared incoherent sparked concern among users who claimed the flub went beyond "stumbling over words."

What are the details?
In the video, the 77-year-old Biden says, "COVID has taken this year — just since the outbreak — has taken 100 year. Look, here's...the lives...it's just...I mean, think about it. More lives this year than any other year for the past 100 years."

One of President Donald Trump's sons, Eric Trump, shared the footage online, claiming, "This is why the Biden campaign doesn't want him to leave his basement — this guy isn't playing with a full deck and it is so irresponsible that the media covers this up..."

Republican activist Brandon Straka, a former liberal and co-founder of the WalkAway movement reacted, "OMG. This isn't a mispronunciation or stumbling over a few words. This is really bad."

Another user asserted, "It's dementia. I've seen it up close, as a lot of us have, sadly. I can't understand why Jill Biden is allowing this to continue." 

And another said, "It's even worse when you see it written down...." 
Someone else stated, "Would anyone let this man handle their checkbook. He is incapacitated. I really don't think he will make it to the election. His family needs to stop this. It's truly sad."

One person replied, "Slip ups are funny but this is watching someone struggle. I just can't see how he could do a debate at this point."

What did Trump critics say?
But Trump critics also weighed in, with one responding to Eric Trump, "Why was your Dad rushed to the hospital recently? Why is he having difficulty walking and why does he keep slurring his speech? Did your Dad have a stroke? This is what the American people want to know!" 

Another wrote, "Yeah, that's awkward. Funny thing is though, Biden is STILL the better choice."

Biden has been dogged by concerns over his gaffes for years, but has faced increased scrutiny both during the primary campaign and general election over his frequent stumbles during speeches. His defenders have attributed the slips to the stutter the former vice president had as a child.

GAETZ

An attorney representing two women who testified before the House Ethics Committee told ABC News in an interview that former Rep.  Matt Gaet...