Sunday, July 30, 2017

The "M" word....by comedian Jeff Foxworthy

Have you ever wondered why it's OK to make jokes about Catholics, Jews, Christians, the Pope, the Irish, the Italians, 
the Polish, the Hungarians, the Chinese, the French (including French Canadians), the elderly, bad golfers, 
men/women, blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive 
to make jokes about the Muslims?

Well, it's time to level the playing field and be politically 
incorrect, by including our friends, the Muslims, on this grandiose list.

So Jeff Foxworthy did his part to include the 
Muslims on his list ...

1. If you grow and refine heroin for a living, but morally 
object to the use of liquor, You may be a Muslim.

2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket launcher, but can't afford shoes, You may be a Muslim.

3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.

4. If you wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon to be unclean, You may be a Muslim.

5. If you think vests come in two styles, Bullet-proof 
and suicide, You may be a Muslim.

6. If you can't think of anyone that you haven't 
declared jihad against, You may be a Muslim.

7. If you consider television dangerous, but routinely 
carry explosives in your clothing, You may be a Muslim.

8. If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses, 
other than setting off roadside bombs, You may be a Muslim.

9. If you have nothing against women and think every man
should own at least four, then you, too, may be a Muslim.

10. If you find this offensive and do not forward it, you are part 
of the problem here in America …but if you delete this, you are 
most likely a Muslim. 
 
HISTORICAL FACT
Who says building a border wall won't work?
The Chinese built one over 2,000 years ago and they 
still don't have any Mexicans.
 

Tell Trump to Grow UP

Just a little sick of Donnie and the nonsense he does and the people around him. The foul mouth little Italian is a flaming joke for communications director as his use of this type of language won't get it.

Donnie you get upset because things don't go your way so what did you expect? You can't push people around in government like you did in private business and people in Washington will not kiss your ring.

Stop the damn tweeting for now and only utilize it when nothing else works and have a grown up review before you send. I donated to you and now I have cut off your tweets, request for funds and will only donate to where it will do the most good, not you. I anticipate you will be a ONE TERM president as nothing is getting done which is not all your fault but part of it is.

What do I expect to happen with health care, SINGLE PAYER is coming because the republicans can't get it together. No where does it state "We the People" have to pay for someone else's health care.

We already pay or assist with Housing, food, cash and god knows what else so very many who can work and do not chose to.

Sad to watch this once great country go in the toilet but I hear the flushing sound getting louder. My time is short and now all I can do is shake my head how crapy our government has become along so many lazy ass Americans.

The Staff: Maybe just maybe some adults have come to the WH (Kelly) and will help control Donnie and his message. Some of us had grown tired of the nonsense going on and now that we have an adult there it will get focused on what "We the People" voted for.

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

FW: SOCIAL SECURITY--DID YOU KNOW?

Things every US citizen should know and remember about Social Security and changes made.

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

Just in case some of you didn't know this. It's easy to
Check out if you don't believe it. Be sure and show
it to your family and friends. They need a little history
lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether
you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.
Social Security Cards up until the 1980’s expressly stated
the number and card were not to be used for identification
purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now
has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway
and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary

2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program,
Now 6.20% on the first $118,000
Plus... 1.45% on ALL earnings (Medicare)
Plus... .9% if you earn more than $200k (Medicare)

3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible

4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program!
Under Johnson, the money was moved to the General Fund and Spent

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never
be taxed as income.
Under Clinton & Gore, Up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed

Since many people have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a taxed Social Security check every month --
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away' -- you may be interested in the following:

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction
for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US .

----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?

That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants (legal or illegal) who moved into this country will receive Social Security payments at age 65 regardless if they paid into the program!

------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------

President Kennedy was the first to misuse the SS funds by using SS money to fund the Peace Corps.  Since then, the SS funds have been used on numerous occasions to fund other foreign nations.

After violating the original contract (FICA), and nearly every aspect of the original "savings" program, the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe the propaganda of the liberals.  If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve.
It's worth a try!!!

How many people can YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers

PLEASE DO KEEP THIS ONE ROLLING ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
HOPEFULLY IT WILL OPEN A FEW EYES!!!!!


Monday, July 24, 2017

WHO HAS THEIR OWN PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE

CONGRESS AND MANY MANY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

We the People get the crap they pass but they don't. Congress has a sweetheart healthcare PLAN and they vote to be exempted from Obamacare or whatever FOLLOWS.

Congress passes laws they don't have to follow but We the People do and can someone tell me why they are so damn special?

Unless and until this crap changes, We the people will continue to get F---ed by the same people we vote in. They don't care about us and yet we the idiot people vote these bums in.

WAKE UP FOLKS 

Nancy Pelosi recently proved again how stupid SHE REALLY IS

The law is common sense. Yet, it is created by lawmakers who seem to be lacking any sense at all.  Many of them do not understand their own laws.    
Nancy Pelosi recently proved this point. The House Minority Leader held a news conference, surrounded by like-minded Democrats, during which she declared that Donald Trump Jr. had broken campaign laws when he met with a Russian lawyer during last year’s presidential campaign to obtain negative information on the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton.  Here is what Pelosi said:
“This is a campaign violation: soliciting, coordinating, or accepting something of value --opposition research, documents, and information—from a foreign national. Plain and simple.”       
In truth, it is plain and simple that Pelosi is wrong. And so are many others who have joined the chorus of condemnation based on laws they have surely never read. Allow me to help them out.   
The Federal Election Commission is the independent regulatory agency which enforces campaign laws enacted by Congress.  On its government website, the FEC makes it clear that it is perfectly lawful for foreign nationals to be involved in American political campaigns:    
“Even though a foreign national cannot make campaign contributions, he or she can serve as an uncompensated volunteer for a campaign or political party”.
The Commission goes on to explain that foreigners are “allowed to attend campaign strategy meetings and events”. They are allowed to contribute ideas, information, and even advice. They are allowed to open their mouths and speak.
None of this is considered to be a donation or “anything of value” under the campaign statutes, as some Democrats and many in the media allege.  To the contrary, the Commission specifically states, “an individual may volunteer his or her personal services to a campaign without making a campaign contribution”. 
The same language is found in both the Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101 8-B) and the Code of Federal Regulations (100.74):
“The value of services provided by any individual who volunteers on behalf of a candidate or political committee is not a contribution.”
Why are foreigners on American soil allowed to volunteer their services and provide information to political campaigns in U.S. elections? The reason should be obvious –the Constitution.      
The First Amendment gives Americans the freedom to associate with whomever they want, including Russians. It gives people the freedom to exchange ideas and information , even with Russians. As long as the information is neither stolen nor classified, there is no crime. There is no civil wrong.   
We do not criminalize free speech and free association in America.  Yet, there is this false mentality that all Russians are boogeymen.  And talking to them is somehow a crime.  It is not.  The founders of our Constitution would be mortified at that notion. 
One commentator recently said, “Donald Trump Jr. had an absolute duty to notify the FBI”. Why? Where is that law or duty written?  If it is not a crime to exchange information with a Russian, why should the FBI be notified? Why would FBI agents be interested in legal activity? Trust me, they are not. Even if a citizen learns of a crime, there is no affirmative duty imposed by law to report it to law enforcement. 
Talking with a Russian and gathering information is not a crime.  Yet Pelosi and others allege that the president’s son may also be guilty of conspiracies to commit espionage and defraud the government. 
As explained in an earlier column, the Trump Jr. meeting is not treason because we are not at war with Russia. It is not collusion in any criminal sense, because that only applies to anti-trust cases.  It is not conspiracy to defraud the government, because the statute requires deceit and dishonesty. And it is not a violation of election laws, because foreign nationals are specifically permitted to volunteer personal services and information to political campaigns.  As for espionage…seriously? What U.S. secrets or classified information is Pelosi talking about?   
Democrats and even some Republicans, like Gov. Chris Christie, are perpetuating the myth that laws must have been broken without ever knowing or studying the law. And many in the media are so ignorant of basic laws and oblivious to the Constitution, they are complicit in misinforming the public. 
Rarely do we see a reporter or anchor ask a lawmaker the tough, challenging question, “What laws, specifically, have been broken? Can you identify a precise statute?” The answer would be a deafening silence. 
Our Constitution was never intended to embody a political point of view. It was made for people of fundamentally differing views. Unfortunately, those in Washington who should know that… do not.    
And the media, which owes its existence to that esteemed document, seem to have forgotten its precious guarantees of freedom. 
The Staff: Above written by a very excellent lawyer and shows just how stupid some democrats are, Most democrats.

GAETZ

An attorney representing two women who testified before the House Ethics Committee told ABC News in an interview that former Rep.  Matt Gaet...