Best
thing you will read for quite a while !
Lou Holtz explains
this situation we are in, brilliantly.
He ‘hits the nail on the head’ so to speak.
See if you don’t agree.
Lou
Holtz Nails It !!
The
Democrats are right, there are two Americas. The America that works and the
America that doesn’t. The America that contributes and the America that
doesn’t. It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts.
Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves,
contribute to society and others don’t. That’s the divide in America .
It’s
not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about a
political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win
elective office. It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves
its country.
That’s
not invective, that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.
The
politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama
pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He noted that some
people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than
others, and he says that’s not just. That is the rationale of thievery.
The
other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat. That
is the philosophy that produced Detroit.
It
is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America. It conceals a
fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up
not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal.
The
Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a
culture of dependence and entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of
ability and hope. The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality
by debasing the successful–seeks to deny the successful the consequences of
their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
Because, by and large, income variations in society are a result of different
choices leading to different consequences.
Those
who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success,
while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater
likelihood of failure.
Success
and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income. You
choose to drop out of high school or to skip college – and you are apt to have
a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with
purposeful education.
You
have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have
them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in
life our destination is determined by the course we take.
My
doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income
inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our
lives also have had an in equality of effort. While my doctor went to college
and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a
job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us
to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean
he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are
both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.
It
is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom
to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if
there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot
less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you
more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if
the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and short sighted decisions.
Barack
Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely
ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow,
so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you
get.”
Obama
would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of
society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement
will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack
Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the
government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through
mediocrity. He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is
based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America
is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the
differences in our efforts.
It
is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the
result of another man’s victimization.
What
Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and
strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political
benefit. That’s what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a
bow. Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s
maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
“Life is ten percent what happens to you and ninety percent how
you respond to it.”
Lou
Holtz
Leo
“Lou” Holtz (born January 6, 1937) is a retired American
football coach, and active sportscaster, author, and motivational speaker.
No comments:
Post a Comment