Bend Over Folks

Why did Bernie Madoff go to prison? To make it simple, he talked people into investing with him. Trouble was, he didn't invest their money. As time rolled on, he simply took the money from the new investors to pay off the old investors. Finally, there were too many old investors and not enough money from new investors coming in to keep the payments going. Next thing you know, Madoff is one of the most hated men in America and he is off to jail. Too few people realize this, but Madoff did to his investors what the government has been doing to us with Social Security. There is no meaningful difference between the two schemes. . . except that one was operated by a private individual who is now in jail, and the other is operated by politicians who enjoy perks, privileges and status in spite of their actions. Do we need a side-by-side comparison here? Well here's a nifty little chart. BERNIE MADOFF SOCIAL SECURITY Takes money from investors with the promise that the money will be invested and made available to them later. Takes money from wage earners with the promise that the money will be invested in a "Trust Fund" and made available later. Instead of investing the money Madoff spends it on nice homes in the Hamptons and yachts. Instead of keeping the money in a trust fund the politicians raid the fund and use it for general spending and vote-buying. When the time comes to pay the investors back Madoff simply uses some of the new funds from newer investors to pay back the older investors. When benefits for older investors become due the politicians pay them with money taken from younger and newer wage earners to pay for the seniors promised benefits. When Madoff's scheme is discovered all hell breaks loose. New investors won't give him any more cash. When Social Security runs out of money they simply force the taxpayers to send them some more. Bernie Madoff is in jail. Politicians remain in Washington ..

The Staff: Remember these folks when November comes around. Also, these same folks have their own Medical and Retirement programs. Only "We the People" are getting hosed.

CANADA IS SMART........make sure you read the IMPORTANT MEDICAL WARNING at the bottom.

Perhaps America and Europe should consider changing their currencies too. Due to the global war on terrorism, many terrorist organizations have had their finances frozen. Consequently, they have resorted to counterfeiting. The Canadians have decided to redesign their currency to prevent the radical Muslims from even touching it! It is also hoped that this will have a positive effect on tourism. Muslim terrorists have to kill themselves if they see a naked woman. Those Canadians always find the solution! Must be the pure water up there in the North! THE STAFF: GOOGLE HAS REMOVED THE PICTURES AGAIN. GUESS THEY DON'T RESPECT FEMALE BREAST

Obama Gun Control - Trying to Skirt the Constitution Again

Just got this...pass it far & wide.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States


On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?

What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.
As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article US. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
14 Nov. 2009 < http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

The Staff: Obama is a traitor to the Constitution he swore to protect and defend. What will the American people do? He now believes it gets in his way.

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON

Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:56pm EDT

(Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."

"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.

While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.

"The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.

However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."

"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.

The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.

Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.

Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.

The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.

Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.

The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.

The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.

A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by seven nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.

The Staff: Just Located this info

AZ. and Immigration

As some our idiot leaders are calling for boycotts against AZ. lets boycott those states until they decide to support the laws. As the federal government won't enforce the laws (both parties) it is the states rights to do so.

States to Boycott: California

Illinois

California is bankrupt and will be asking the rest of us to bail them out. To hell with them as they got themselves into this mess and they can get out of it themselves. Arnold wants the illegals in, let them pay there own bills (foods stamps, healthcare, school cost). The unions and state government have brought this upon themselves by wild spending, they can make cuts to stop the bleeding.

If New York is next, let them fall or they should cut their spending to live within their means. We the People have to live within our means unless we are here as illegals and then the rest of us pay their bills. Our government has allowed this to happen (both parties) and now we have to bail out our own government due to their fiscal irresponsibility. We need to vote the bums out who have brought our country to this point. THIS MEANS BOTH PARTIES.

As more states kiss ass to the illegals and boycott AZ., I will keep adding those gutless states as I can. Someone recently said the Democrats want the votes from these people and the Republicans want the cheap labor. I agree and couldn't have said it better.

Reagen gave amnesty to 20 million years ago and said we would secure the boarder. Never happened and here we are again. If the government doesn't stop this invasion, maybe it is time "We the People" do something to stop the invasion ourselves. Our government has failed and continues to do so. At what point do we say enough and do it ourselves?

VOTE NOVEMBER 2010 TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY

FROM KISS ASS POLITICIANS

Supreme Court Making Laws Per - Bob Beckle

Bob Beckle just stated on Fox News "The Supreme Court Makes Law" in reference to the new nominee. I was taught in school the Congress and Senate make the laws and the Supremes interpret the laws. Does his statement make it very clear now what the democrats want? Yes, a Supreme Court that WRITES laws. Another way the Obama administration want to change America, shred the Constitution a little more.

Obingo

If you have trouble staying attentive when our President was speaking. Try playing Obingo, it works. If you have a room full of people you can add to the interest by giving small prizes such as the interest you get on long term cds or the number of potatoes you can buy for a $1. Have Fun! Here is something to help make Obama's speeches more interesting... and God knows we need it. Just print out this page, distribute it to your friends, and go listen... (be sure to read directions at the bottom) Rules for Bull ... Bingo 1. Before Barrack Obama's next televised speech, print your "Bullshit Bingo" 2. Check off the appropriate block when you hear one of those words/phrases. 3. When you get five blocks horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, stand up and shout "BULLSHIT!" Testimonials from past satisfied "Bullshit Bingo" players: "I had been listening to the speech for only five minutes when I won." - Jack W., Boston "My attention span during speeches has improved dramatically." - David D., Florida "What a gas! Speeches will never be the same for me after my first win." - Bill R., New York City "The atmosphere was tense in the last speech as 14 of us waited for the fifth box." - Ben G., Denver "The speaker was stunned as eight of us screamed "BULLSHIT!" for the third time in two hours." - Mike., Burlington . Co The Staff: Couldn't help but place this for all to see. UPDATE: GOOGLE HAS REMOVED THE BINGO CARD