I am the worst terrorist attack the United States will ever face. SO TRUE!!!!! And very scary.....

He told all of us he was going to Change America, Aren't you glad you voted for this Traitor.

Traitors to America and Peace

Below is a list of Democrats who voted to support the deal with Iran and allows them to obtain a Nuclear Weapon in the years to come. If anyone believed this would prevent one, read the agreement. We can only hope the next administration has the courage to assist Israel and take out this rogue terrorist country.  

What did we get from this agreement? Nothing as Obama the great deal maker bent over for his Muslim buddies. Has anyone noticed how friendly he is with Radical Muslims and yet can't stand the Jewish State? He has weakened America, turned on our previous friends and tells us he is making American better. Got some Banana mine stock if you buy into this crap.

Does anyone remember Chamberlain and WW2? He sold out Europe and his own country trying to make a deal with Hitler. How did that turn out for all the Jewish people and millions of others who use to walk on this planet? All I can say, here we go again.

You now have a chance to get rid of the people below who voted to have a nuclear weapon discharged on our soil as it is only a matter of time. Sooner then later it will happen and you can thank all the liberals who voted to allow Iran a bomb and the delivery system they are working on. Remember John Kerry get a lot of credit for this. He once called serviceman "Baby Killers" when he came back from Vietnam. He was a liar then and the same holds true today.

Obama is a traitor but not a surprise to many of us. He has changed (destroyed the best he could) America in the time he has had but others will follow if allowed. America was great ONCE but no more. You can thank people like him, Reid and so many others.

DEMOCRATS – YES (42)

Sen. Tammy Baldwin (Wis.) — "Simply put, I do not believe that rejecting this agreement is in our national security interest," Baldwin said in a statement.

Sen. Michael Bennet (Colo.) — He called the deal a "flawed, but important step" to preventing a nuclear Iran and keeping Israel safe in a statement first reported by the Denver Post.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) 

Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) — “We have now passed a point of no return that we should have never reached, leaving our nation to choose between two imperfect, dangerous and uncertain options,” said Booker in a statement. “Left with these two choices, I nonetheless believe it is better to support a deeply flawed deal, for the alternative is worse.”

Sen. Barbara Boxer (Calif.) — "In my view, this agreement is the only way to ensure that Iran's nuclear program is used exclusively for civilian purposes, which is in the best interest of the United States, Israel and the world," Boxer said in a statement.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio) — "This deal is not about trusting the Iranian regime, but instead working with our allies on comprehensive, verifiable restrictions to block Iran's pathways to a nuclear bomb without precipitating another war in the Middle East,” said Brown in a statement first reported by USA Today.

Sen. Maria Cantwell (Wash.)

Sen. Tom Carper (Del.) — Carper said the deal "beats the likely alternative - war with Iran - hands down," in an op-ed for the News Journal.

Sen. Bob Casey, Jr. (Pa.) 

Sen. Chris Coons (Del.) — "We are better off trying diplomacy first," Coons told the Washington Post.

Sen. Joe Donnelly (Ind.) — "I owe it to the men and women of our Armed Forces and to the people of Indiana to have exhausted every other option to stop Iran before we would consider putting any of our servicemembers in harm’s way,” Donnelly said in a statement.

Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) — "Finding a diplomatic solution will make our country, our allies and the world a safer place,” said the Senate's No. 2 Democrat.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) — “I stand behind the U.S. negotiating team and will support this agreement in the Senate,” Feinstein, the ranking member of the Intelligence panel, said Tuesday.

Sen. Al Franken (Minn.) — “[T]o take the extraordinary step of rejecting it — because of clearly unrealistic expectations, because of a hunger to send Americans into another war, or, worst of all, because of petty partisanship — would be a terrible mistake,” said Franken in an op-ed for CNN.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.) — “Our goal has been, and remains, to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. We have far more ability to achieve that outcome if we approve this deal‎,” said Gillibrand in a statement.

Sen. Martin Heinrich (N.M.) — "This deal sets the stage for a safer and more stable Middle East and a more secure United States of America," said Heinrich.

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) — “It isn’t a perfect deal, but it is a good one. Americans deserve to see this deal through,” Heitkamp said in a statement.

Sen. Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) — Hirono said Iran’s nuclear program “will be disabled for many years” under the deal. 

Sen. Tim Kaine (Va.) — Kaine called the deal a "dramatic improvement over the status quo."

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) — “While the agreement is by no means perfect, I have concluded that it is our best available option to put the brakes on Iran’s development of a nuclear weapon and that is why I will support it,” said Klobuchar in a statement. “In conjunction with that support I will also push for increased security assistance to Israel and enhanced defense cooperation with our Arab allies to combat terrorism throughout the region.”

Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) — "The current alternatives, if this agreement is rejected, are either unrealistic or downright dangerous and so, based upon what we know now, I intend to vote in favor of the agreement,” King said.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (Vt.) — "I know from my conversations with the president and Secretary Kerry and Moniz how difficult this was. I also know from my conversations with them, they were prepared to walk away than settle for a bad deal. ... This is not a bad deal," said Leahy.

Sen. Ed Markey (Mass.) — I believe our negotiators achieved as much as they reasonably could, and that if strictly implemented, this plan can be effective," he said in a statement.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) — "This deal isn't perfect and no one trusts Iran, but it has become clear to me that the world is united behind this agreement with the exception of the government of Israel," she said in a statement. "I respect and understand those who oppose it but I have become convinced that it is more dangerous to Israel, America and our allies to walk away in the face of unified world-wide support."

Sen. Jeff Merkley (Ore.) — "I believe the agreement, titled the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), is the best available strategy to block Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon," he said in a statement.  

Sen. Barbara Mikulski (Md.) — “No deal is perfect, especially one negotiated with the Iranian regime," she said in a statement. "I have concluded that this Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is the best option available to block Iran from having a nuclear bomb. For these reasons, I will vote in favor of this deal." Mikulski is also retiring from the Senate. 

Sen. Chris Murphy (Conn.) — “The test for this agreement, then, is simple: is Iran less likely to obtain a nuclear weapon with this deal than without it? Because I answer this question affirmatively, I will support this agreement when it comes before the United States Senate for a vote in September," Murphy said in a statement.

Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.) — "I am hopeful that this deal will be implemented and will move us closer to our goal of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but I will be monitoring it closely and will be ready to join others in moving quickly on other options if Iran choses to pursue an unacceptable path," she said in a statement.

Sen. Bill Nelson (Fla.) — "If the U.S. walks away from this multinational agreement, I believe we would find ourselves alone in the world with little credibility," said Nelson on the Senate floor.

Sen. Gary Peters (Mich.) 

Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.) — "No one assumes Iran will change its stripes, which is why the agreement is built on a foundation of intrusive inspections and constant verification," said Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Sen. Harry Reid (Nev.) — "I’m going to do everything in my power to make sure the deal stands,” the Senate minority leader told The Washington Post.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — "This agreement is obviously not all that many of us would have liked but it beats the alternative — a war with Iran that could go on for years," said the 2016 contender for the Democratic nomination.

Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) — "This is the best possible way to deny Iran from acquiring the bomb. It is what is best for the United States, Israel, and peace in the region." 

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) — “Rejecting this agreement would leave us with no credible non-military options for stopping Iran’s nuclear weapons program,” said Shaheen in a statement.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (Mich.) — “I have determined that the imminent threat of Iran having a nuclear weapon outweighs any flaws I see in the international agreement. For this reason, I must support the agreement," Stabenow said in a statement.

Sen. Jon Tester (Mont.) — Tester called the deal “the only option right now,” according to Dennis Bragg, a reporter for local station KPAX.

Sen. Tom Udall (N.M.) — "I urge my colleagues to support this agreement," Udall said in a floor speech. "We have a choice between this deal or no deal. I do not believe we will get another chance."

Sen. Mark Warner (Va.) — “This agreement is just the beginning, and not the end, of our combined international efforts to keep Iran free of nuclear weapons," said Warner in a statement.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) — “The question now before Congress — the only question before Congress — is whether the recently announced nuclear agreement represents our best available option for preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,” Warren told The Boston Globe. “I am convinced that it does.”

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.) — "Short of war, with all its dramatic uncertainties and terrible costs, I do not see another pathway to impose a nuclear weapons-free Iran," said Whitehouse in a statement.

Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.) 

Liberal Plans for Americans

"8 Levels of Control - Useful Idiots

Saul Alinsky   died about 43 years ago, but his writings influenced those in political control of our nation today.......

 

Recall that Hillary did her college thesis on his writings and Obama writes about him in his books.

Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA

Education: University of Chicago

Spouse: Irene Alinsky

Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals

Anyone out there think that this stuff isn't happening today in the U.S. ?

 

All eight rules are currently in play

 

How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:

 

There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.

 

1) Healthcare– Control healthcare and you control the people.

 

2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

 

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

 

4) Gun Control– Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

 

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)

 

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

 

7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

 

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

 

Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States ?

 

Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule. Stalin described his converts as"Useful Idiots."  The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.

 

 If  people can read this and still say everything is just fine…  they are “useful idiots”.

 

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere ” .

Admiral James Lyons: US Security Agencies Commit 'Treason'

U.S. national security is being compromised by President Barack Obama's lawless liberal agenda, says retired U.S. Navy Admiral James "Ace" Lyons, former commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

"It really goes back to when he was still senator in 2008, when he declared he would fundamentally change America. Most Americans didn't know what that meant," Lyons said Monday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.
Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now

"I have to say look at America in 2008, what was wrong with it then? We had some problems, but nothing like what we have seen today."

Lyons says the nation's top security agencies have been infused with the ideology of Islamic fundamentalism and the Muslim Brotherhood.

"They penetrated every one of our national security agencies. They've had undue influence on our policies for the Middle East," he said.

"What we have is an antiwar activist on a global war on terrorism as our president. They've reversed ideology, that it's American power that has caused most of the world's problems is at the core of their belief."

Lyons said the liberal agenda is being pressed under the guise of "political correctness."

"[It] has infected the leadership in all our civilian and military agencies, and it's unconscionable what's going on. Actually, it's more than the Constitution it has violated," he said.

"There have been, in my view, actual treason been committed, and at the head of that is the Benghazi tragedy. 

"We used to have giants in Congress . . . When it came to matters of national security, they were Americans first and party took second place. We don't have that today, except for a few in the minority. It's unconscionable what's going on."

Our Leaders Sold us Out in the Past and Still Do Today - You can't hide History

ROGER ARONOFF: Next up we have Admiral James “Ace” Lyons, U.S. Navy Retired. Admiral Lyons was a U.S. Navy officer for 36 years, serving most recently as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, the largest single military command in the world, where his initiatives directly contributed to the economic stability and humanitarian understanding in the Pacific and Indian Ocean regions, and brought the U.S. Navy fleet back to China. As the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations from 1983 to 1985, he was the principle advisor on all joint chiefs of staff matters and was the father of the Navy Red Cell, an anti-terrorism group composed of Navy SEALs he established in response to the Marine Barracks bombing in Beirut. Admiral Lyons was also commander of the U.S. 2nd fleet and commander of the Striking Fleet, which were the principle fleets for implementing the maritime strategy. He is President and CEO of LION Associates, which provides strategic consulting in the areas of foreign policy and security affairs. Ace Lyons.

RETIRED ADMIRAL JAMES “ACE” LYONS: Thank you, Roger. Thank you all for coming and spending the day here with us. As I said at the National Press Club a few weeks ago, what went on at Benghazi was un-American. There’s no other way to explain it. Obviously, we know we had resources that could have been brought to bear. We know that there were stand down orders given. We know that there were the Marine anti-terrorist units at Rota, one of which went to Tripoli, but the other one never was sent to Benghazi were it was supposed to go to secure–and I’m going to call it the consulate, the hell with this “SMC” stuff–

LYONS: –which would have immediately permitted the FBI to get in and gather the significant intelligence. What we’re seeing here is something that goes back many years. One of the underlying things in here is you don’t make city hall mad. And I have to tell you, when you get fired by the mayor of Chicago for incompetence and you wind up as the president’s Harry Hopkins, we got a problem. What we’re seeing here in Benghazi, as I said, goes back many years. Didn’t just start here under the Obama Administration. It goes all the way back to the Carter Administration and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. We could have cut it off at its knees right then. I was the director of political and military affairs when the Khomenei regime took our Embassy in Tehran. The chairman called me up and said ‘What can we do?’ I said, ‘I’ll tell you what we’re going to do. We’re going to take Kharg Island and we’re going to do with a bunch of SEALs and special forces.’ We could have walked in and we’d have had them by the gonads. We would have knocked the legs from right out from under them. And of course our illustrious naval academy graduate–I never did like the class of ’47–

LYONS: –rejected that out of hand. And we had the follow on kidnappings, murder of our CIA station chief, and leading up to April 1983, when they blew up our Embassy. And that was followed by our Marine Barracks blowup, October 23rd, 1983–and I’ve got to tell you, that never had to happen, because four weeks approximately, almost four weeks before the bombing NSA had the information. They made the intercept. What they intercepted was the Iranian Ambassador in Damascus reporting back to the Iranian foreign ministry of the orders that he had given to the leadership of the groups in Beirut, which he had received from Tehran. And in that message he direct–he told them, you are to concentrate your attacks on the multinational force, but you are to take a spectacular action against the United States Marines. That intercept, that message was dated 27 September 1983.

I did not, I was the Deputy Chief for Naval Operations when that happened, and I did not get to see that message until the 25th of October–two days after the event. Now where was it? I tried to get the [Government Accountability Office] to do an investigation and so forth. Never could find out, but we know the orders, I’m sure for the Embassy blowup and for the Marine Barracks blowup, proof positive, came from Tehran. In fact, I testified in the District Court here where Judge Lamberth found Iran culpable. We were testifying on behalf of the families of those that were killed.

But that’s not the worst of it. We had the specific information. We knew which group did the bombing. It was the Islamic Amal, which was the forerunner to Hezbollah. I was working with [William] Casey and John McMahon– I won’t go into all of that–but we nailed them, and, in fact, two days after the bombing, Casey asked me to come out to Langley and he says, ‘If we found out who did it, would I make up the plans to take them out?’ And I said, ‘Of course!’ He said, ‘By the way, there’s one stipulation. Whatever we give you, you cannot share with the joint staff.’ He didn’t want to read about it in the next edition of the Post. I agreed.

I let Lehman know, who was the Secretary of the Navy then, and Jim Watkins, who is my boss, the CNO. Casey goes off on one of his famous trips. They located the Islamic Amal. They were holed up in the Lebanese army barracks above Baalbek, the Sheikh Abdullah Barracks. We had peopleinside. We had the photographs. We were going to make it look like a plowed cornfield in Kansas. We had the planes loaded.

The day of the meeting, of the NSE meeting, Casey comes back from his trip. McMahon calls me up and says, ‘Casey’s back and he insists on taking the meeting.’ I said, ‘John, you can’t let that happen. It’s going to get screwed up.’ He said, ‘There’s nothing I can do about it.’ And, of course, before this I had briefed the joint chiefs, I had briefed [Unintelligible], who was the chairman, the joint chiefs and then I went up and briefed Weinberger.

And I’ve got to tell you something. You’re all sitting there. Here we have the largest loss of Marines since Okinawa, and if I walked into you and you’re the chairman or the Secretary of Defense, and I said, ‘We got them,’ your reaction, I’m sure, would be elation. You’d be elated. You’d want, ‘Go get them.’ The reaction I got was almost like they didn’t want to hear it. I couldn’t believe it, but I ignored it and, so, I finished briefing everybody including Weinberger, and told them about the message intercept, and so on. So, he had everything. We had actually briefed the Vice President offline. We were known to do that occasionally.

And, at the meeting they go around the table, they brief Reagan, and it gets to Weinberger and he says, ‘I think there are Lebanese army troops in those barracks.’ And Reagan turned to Casey, and said, ‘Well, what about that, Bill?’ Well, of course, Bill doesn’t know diddley-squat from [Unintelligible] on this because he just got back. So, the President promptly said you guys go back and sort it out. So I got to download the planes.

And okay, lo and behold, come back, and no, there are no Lebanese army troops in those barracks. But this time, and I get this direct from Bud McFarlane, who is the National Security Advisor, Weinberger starts waving his arms and so forth: ‘We’re going to lose all our Arab friends if we go ahead with this strike.’ We never got the orders to strike. And of course, what was the message? The message became Osama bin Laden’s rallying cry: “The Americans can’t suffer casualties. They will cut and run.” And, all those [Unintelligible], well we moved them off shore.

In the eyes of everybody else, we cut and ran–not by our troops but by our politicians. And all that crap you read in Reagan’s diary–the intelligence wasn’t good enough–was pure nonsense. We would have been in and out in a minute and a half. In the words of the carrier strike force commander Jerry Tuttle, this was a chip shot.

I mean, pure and simple. We could have changed the course of history. That’s the second time we could have done it. The third time was during the Gulf Tanker War, and here they were in a life-death struggle with Iraq and they’re still conducting attacks against us! Drag the mine out in front reflagged tanker, and etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. So we had devised a plan starting in October 1986 to shut Iran down. I had Weinberger at my headquarters at Pearl Harbor, briefed him on it. He didn’t want to hear about it. He kept trying to get out of the chair, and I kept shoving him back in the chair.

But we had the ability. I had three carrier, three carrier battle groups. The battleship battle group, an amphibious ready group, and we were going to march up that gulf, we were going to shut everything down, including their nuclear site, Bushehr, and I think we could have brought the Khomenei regime down. Well, of course, that’s the last thing they wanted to hear.

Now, why all this? Now, I talked to the chairman Crow at the time, and this penetration of our government from Islam has been going on for years, and years, and years. He told me, the chairman, he said, by Prince Bandar–you heard him mentioned this morning. Prince Bandar had carte blanche access to the Pentagon. He was basically living in the chairman’s office. The chairman told me he feels like he’s sleeping with him, and knowing Bandar, maybe he was–I don’t know.

So, but it’s a, it’s an insidious thing that has gone on here, and as we see over the years the penetration of the Muslim Brotherhood, their front organization, has increased, increased, increased, and it’s at the pit, really, of the stupid restricted rules of engagement that we imposed on our wonderful military, sacrificing their lives in the failed hope of winning the hearts and minds of a tribal society. This is nuts. But, again, who ruled the day? Political correctness.

Our leadership did not speak out. They did not speak out previously, they have not spoken out today. And that’s why you wound up with a Benghazi. And there’s one other thing. When you don’t, you don’t want to make city hall mad, so it’s an insidious type of penetration going on here that results in the corruption of our government institutions that is really ought to be based on loyalty and patriotism. And when that gets compromised, you wind up with what you’re seeing today: this tremendous coverup. The NDAs, the polygraphs, all the–

I tried to get to the Blue Mountain security manager. I got the number from Roger. In London. He refused to take my call. I’m sure State, he’s got other contracts with State and they said, ‘You talk, they’re gone.’ It’s just such a tremendous effort here, and it’s really eating away at our core principles. As I said in my op-ed last Friday, what was the objective? Why are we undermining the fundamental morals and principles of our military, because that’s where, that’s what’s gives us our capability to project the right image of the United States? So, let me wrap it up by just saying that there’s more than just Benghazi going on here. So, thanks again. Great to be with you.

ARONOFF: Thank you, “Ace.” Yeah, we two-teamed those guys at Blue Mountain, and I actually had the head of it on the phone. They put me through, and when he heard who I was, he just, there was silence and then he just hung up. And then I turned it over to him, and he wouldn’t even take his call, so. Anyway.

Three Presidents

No one in either party has the courage to do this. --- (until now) 

What did Presidents Hoover , Truman, and Eisenhower have in common?

This is something that should be of great interest for you to pass around. I didn't know of this until it was pointed out to me.

Back during the great depression, Herbert Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs available to American citizens that desperately needed work.

Harry Truman deported over two million illegal aliens after WWII to create jobs for returning veterans.

In 1954 Dwight Eisenhower deported 13 million Mexicans. The program was called Operation Wetback. It was done so WWII and Korean War veterans would have a better chance at jobs. It took two years, but they deported them!

Now, if they could deport the illegal aliens back then, they could surely do it today. If you have doubts about the veracity of this information, enter Operation Wetback into your favorite search engine and confirm it for yourself.

Why, you might ask, can't they do this today? Actually the answer is quite simple.

Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower were men of honor, not untrustworthy politicians looking for votes!

This applies only to non-documented immigrants

Reminder: Don't forget to pay your taxes - 12 to 20 million illegal aliens - are depending on it

She Looks Good in Orange

The key is somewhere between her emails and Obama’s transcripts.  Never to be found.

Hillary: “Bill, how long am I going to be in here?"

Bill: "At this point, what difference does it make?"

SOMEONE TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA FINALLY

This is a rare situation, when a high ranking official publically shares such damning "inside" information, and makes such radical comments about the incumbent President!  I'm positive there are many others who feel the same, but for fear of losing their jobs (or life) won't speak up.

  Stunning Video the country was never supposed to see....

SOS John Kerry introduces Admiral Ace Lyons to speak at a private meeting.

He probably regrets doing so.

This video probably won't be around long !!!  
  
  
http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=51fe948515b4