Here We Go Again

Here we go again!!!!!!  As you all know, Donald Trump made a big deal about Obama's birth certificate. As of yesterday, the White House released the birth certificate. I will tell you right now that I had never given this "birther" issue any credit. I watched the hype and the crazies come out. I completely dismissed the entire ordeal altogether. In fact, it was not until the White House released the birth certificate that it had gained my attention. I am the studious sort of guy, and I have plenty of time on my hands. So, I took a close look at this document. While I would have thought that this issue would have been closed for good (and, got the crazies to crawl back into their holes), I found two extremely strange inconsistencies that merit some attention. First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern [on the contrary, it is of great concern, because it confirms BO was born of only one citizen parent, grounds alone for removal from the WH, but we will ignore that fact for now], except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth.  Check this fact here: http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110501173430AAM56jo How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up until Kenya was formed in 1963 and at the time of Obama Sr.'s birth, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". But, this is not the only thing that I found that just does not jive.  The other item that I looked into was the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? Go ahead, look it up. I am not talking crazy talk, these are the facts. Like I said, I thought that this was a non-issue until the actual certificate was released. Now that it has been released, of course I had to look into it.  Now I have found these issues, I know that something is up. If you doubt me, just look at the following resources: Sure as hell, the hospital part is true, as you can read about the 1978 merger here.  If that doesn't work, here's the link: http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx The Staff: We take no position and only post information sent to us