Loud Mouth of the Month

 Putin and all the crap he says allows him to have the monthly prize as "Loudmouth of The Month".

He isn't going to Nuc anyone as he knows it would mean the end to his bullshit life. He has lied to the Russian people for years and years to maintain his power grip. America and the rest of the world have no desire to control Russia as he has taken it for a ride.

Soon the Russian people will learn how this SOB has screwed them over for years. All his buddies are rich and the common hard working Russian has shit for a life. 

Wake up people of Russia and toss that trash leader out along with the other rich people who have stolen your life. 

Biden has Caused this

Shortages in baby formula and tampons plague the Biden administration which keeps claiming they are handling it, yet the shortages continue.

Truth Hurts

President Biden’s proposed visit to the “West Bank” is promising to end up becoming a fruitless trip to an artificially-coined destination supposedly inhabited by a mythical ancient “Palestinian people”.

This scenario is far removed from the biblical and historic realities that had existed for 3000 years prior to April 24, 1950—when Biden’s destination was called “Judea and Samaria” – the ancient and biblical heartland of the Jewish people.
Biden’s Press Secretary—Karine Jean-Pierre –exposed Biden’s – and her—apparent ignorance of these indisputable facts when announcing the President’s forthcoming visit in these terms: 

“The President will also visit the West Bank to consult with the Palestinian Authority and to reiterate his strong support for a two-state solution, with equal measures of security, freedom, and opportunity for the Palestinian people.

United Nations resolutions and Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) propaganda has used Jean-Pierre’s faux narrative since 1967 in a concerted effort to deny the Jewish people have any right to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem under article 6 of the 1922 League of Nations Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the 1945 United Nations Charter.

This post-1967 narrative differs from that used on 1 December 1948 when a conference organized in Jericho and attended by numerous Arab delegations including mayors of Hebron, Bethlehem, Ramallah, the Arab Legion Military Governor General and military governors from all districts, and other notables adopted the following resolution:

“Palestine Arabs desire unity between Transjordan and Arab Palestine and therefore make known their wish that Arab Palestine be annexed immediately to Transjordan. They also recognize Abdullah as their King and request him proclaim himself King of new territory.”

The Jericho Conference came after:

• The Mandatory Power – Great Britain – had granted independence on June 27, 1946 to Transjordan – 78% of the territory comprised in the 1922 Mandate for Palestine located East of the Jordan River
• Transjordan had invaded Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem– 4% of the Mandate territory located West of the Jordan River – on May 15, 1948—driving out all the Jews living there as it assumed control of these areas.

The Jericho resolution confirms:

• There was then no identifiable “Palestinian people” – only “Palestine Arabs”.
• The leaders of the “Palestine Arabs” were not calling for the creation of a second Arab State in the territory formerly comprised in the Mandate for Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital –in addition to Transjordan.

Despite International and Arab League objections—unification of these two exclusively-occupied Arab territories—comprising some 82% of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine located on both sides of the Jordan River—was achieved on April 24, 1950 – resulting in:

• “Judea and Samaria” being designated the “West Bank”
• The newly-unified entity being named “Jordan”
• “Palestine Arabs” living in the “West Bank” becoming “Jordanian citizens”
• A two-state solution in former Palestine:  one Jewish State called Israel in 18% of former Palestine and one Arab State called Jordan in the remaining 82% of Palestine.

 

Interesting

he Jericho Conference came after:

• The Mandatory Power – Great Britain – had granted independence on June 27, 1946 to Transjordan – 78% of the territory comprised in the 1922 Mandate for Palestine located East of the Jordan River
• Transjordan had invaded Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem– 4% of the Mandate territory located West of the Jordan River – on May 15, 1948—driving out all the Jews living there as it assumed control of these areas.

The Jericho resolution confirms:

• There was then no identifiable “Palestinian people” – only “Palestine Arabs”.
• The leaders of the “Palestine Arabs” were not calling for the creation of a second Arab State in the territory formerly comprised in the Mandate for Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital –in addition to Transjordan.

Despite International and Arab League objections—unification of these two exclusively-occupied Arab territories—comprising some 82% of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine located on both sides of the Jordan River—was achieved on April 24, 1950 – resulting in:

• “Judea and Samaria” being designated the “West Bank”
• The newly-unified entity being named “Jordan”
• “Palestine Arabs” living in the “West Bank” becoming “Jordanian citizens”
• A two-state solution in former Palestine:  one Jewish State called Israel in 18% of former Palestine and one Arab State called Jordan in the remaining 82% of Palestine.

Xi Rewrites History

BEIJING (AP) — Hong Kong is preparing to introduce new middle school textbooks that will deny the Chinese territory was ever a British colony. China's Communist rulers say the semi-autonomous city and the nearby former Portuguese colony of Macao were merely occupied by foreign powers and that China never relinquished sovereignty over them.

It's not a new position for China, but the move is a further example of Beijing’s determination to enforce its interpretation of history and events and inculcate patriotism as it tightens its grip over Hong Kong following massive protests demanding democracy in 2019.

“Hong Kong has been Chinese territory since ancient times,” says one new textbook seen by the AP. “While Hong Kong was occupied by the British following the Opium War, it remained Chinese territory.”

It is one of four sets of textbooks being offered to schools to replace those currently in use, all stating the same position, Hong Kong's South China Morning Post newspaper reported earlier this week.

Hong Kong was a British colony from 1841 until its handover to Chinese rule in 1997, with the exception of Japanese occupation from 1941 to 1945. Its colonial status was the result of a pair of 19th century treaties signed at the end of the first and second Opium Wars, along with the granting of a 99-year lease in 1898 to the New Territories, which greatly expanded the size of the colony.

China’s Communist Party, which seized power during a civil war in 1949, says it never recognized what it calls the “unequal treaties” that the former Qing Dynasty was compelled to sign following military defeats.

In the late 20th century — with China unwilling to extend the lease on the New Territories, and the colony not viable without them — Britain entered into protracted and often contentious negotiations with Beijing over conditions for the return of Hong Kong to Chinese rule.

Ultimately, China took control of Hong Kong in 1997 under a “one country, two systems" arrangement that would keep the city's economic, political and judicial systems distinct from those in mainland China for 50 years. That was laid out in a 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration registered with the United Nations, although China now refuses to recognize the agreement.

HAS THIS ISSUE COME UP BEFORE?

In 1972, just months after the China seat at the United Nations was transferred to Beijing from the Republic of China government that fled to Taiwan during the civil war, the government acted to remove Hong Kong and Macao, which reverted to Chinese rule in 1999, from a U.N. list of colonies, effectively stripping them of their right to self-determination.

At a time when European nations had granted independence to other colonies, China feared the same could happen to the British and Portuguese enclaves it wanted back. “The settlement of the questions of Hong Kong and Macao is entirely within China’s sovereign right and does not at all fall under the ordinary category of ‘Colonial Territories,'" China's representative said at the time.

Mary Gallagher, who teaches Chinese studies at the University of Michigan, said then-Chinese leader Mao Zedong wanted to ensure that Hong Kong would remain part of China. “So Hong Kong moves between the Chinese empire and the British empire, but loses its right to determine its own future,” she said.

WHY IS HONG KONG CHANGING TEXTBOOKS NOW?

The new textbooks are part of broader changes to education following the 2019 protests, in which many students participated and some played leadership roles.

The texts are for liberal studies classes, which the government overhauled last year after pro-Beijing lawmakers and supporters said they encouraged opposition and activist thought. The classes now focus on themes such as national security, patriotism and identity.

The textbooks promote the official view that the protest movement was the result of foreign agitation and threatened national security. The Beijing government used such arguments to pass a sweeping National Security Law for Hong Kong in 2020 curtailing free speech, criticism of authorities and political opposition.

Authorities have launched a National Security Education Day on April 15, with students encouraged to learn more about national security and take part in educational activities that emphasize the importance of protecting China.

WHERE IS THIS LEADING?

The new textbooks are part of a push to bring Hong Kong's institutional values more closely in line with those of mainland China, especially in the areas of politics and history. Increasingly, Chinese leader Xi Jinping is imposing his vision of strongly nationalistic and increasingly authoritarian rule on the region.

China has sought to eradicate any memory of the military's 1989 bloody suppression of student-led protests centered on Beijing's Tiananmen Square, citing pandemic concerns to ban once huge public commemorations in Hong Kong on the June 4 anniversary.

“The Communist Party has a monopoly of the truth and of history in China,” said Steve Tsang, a Chinese politics specialist at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. “In the Xi approach to history, facts are merely incidental. Only interpretation matters. And only one interpretation is allowed.”

The Staff: There is the truth and then there is what Xi decides.

 

Here is an American Dirty Company

BlackRock, the world’s largest investment manager that oversees $10 trillion in client funds, has positioned itself as a socially conscious firm. However, the company is choosing China over the United States as it advances its environmental and social priorities, according to Will Hild, executive director of Washington-based nonprofit Consumers’ Research.

Hild said BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is “selling out the interests of American consumers and American companies in the United States, in return for personal favors for BlackRock in mainland China,” during a recent interview with EpochTV’s “China Insider.”

BlackRock and ESGControlling America but Benefiting China—With Will Hild

Fink has been one of the most prominent advocates for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investment, which is investing in companies that agree to uphold certain environmental, social, and governance standards.

However, according to Hild, ESG “is an excuse for Wall Street to push politics into corporate America.” In other words, Wall Street is pushing ESG policies that “could never be achieved at the ballot box.”

BlackRock has also taken up the position of supporting a net-zero emission future. The company’s website tells its clients that “climate transition creates a historic investment opportunity.” In a 2020 letter to CEOs, Fink wrote that “climate risk is investment risk.”

While BlackRock has pushed U.S. companies such as ExxonMobil to embrace green energy, it hasn’t taken the same approach with Chinese firms, according to Hild.

“Ironically, Blackrock controls about the same amount of shares, about  7 1/2 percent, of PetroChina as they do Exxon, but they don’t engage in any of the same behavior when it comes to that company,” he said. ”I think if they did, Larry Fink would find himself not welcomed in mainland China very quickly because we know how that government acts.”

PetroChina is the listed arm of China’s state-owned China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). In February, Russian state-owned energy company Gazprom inked a 30-year deal with CNPC, paving the way for Russia-to-China natural gas via a new pipeline linking the Russian Far East with northeastern China.

Hild said BlackRock’s excuse for not pushing Chinese firms is “so absurd.”

“The excuse that they use is that China is still a developing economy, and so we cannot force the same rules on them,” he said.

In 2021, BlackRock sided with hedge fund firm Engine No.1, which replaced new directors on ExxonMobil’s board, believing that the oil giant had responded too weakly to the climate crisis. Citing a Wall Street Journal report, Hild said the board subsequently considered divesting itself from two gas and oil projects in Mozambique and Vietnam.

Hild said the projects would have “served American consumers at the pump so that prices could have been brought down.” 

“Effectively BlackRock and Larry Fink are using America as China’s carbon offset. They are not putting pressure on China to decarbonize,” he said. “And so they are putting up corporate America on an unlevel playing field here in the United States, against their rivals in China. And they’re using American investment dollars to do that.”

One favor BlackRock received from the Chinese regime was being granted the right to start the first wholly foreign-owned mutual fund business in China, according to Hild.

In August 2021, BlackRock Fund Management Co., BlackRock’s business in China, launched a mutual fund product in China, making it the first mutual fund offering by a wholly foreign-owned company, according to China’s state-run media.

Consumers’ Research Warns US Governors About BlackRock’s Retirement Fund Investments in China

Many state governments in the United States have invested their pension funds with BlackRock. According to a 2021 report (pdf) from Consumers’ Research, Washington, Florida, and New York were the top three investors, investing $13.8 billion, $10.7 billion, and $9.8 billion, respectively,

The report also warns about BlackRock putting investors’ money in Chinese companies with ties to the Chinese military, such as China’s biggest chipmaker, SMIC.

“BlackRock’s investment choices are not only risking the security of U.S. pensions, but the security of our nation as a whole,” the report reads.

With the United States facing record-high inflation, Hild believes that BlackRock’s investment decisions, which help industrialize China while deindustrializing the United States, aren’t benefiting pensioners.

“It’s going to hurt their returns as pensioners. And it’s going to hurt them at the gas pump and the grocery store and all the other places they spend money,” he said.

Representatives for BlackRock didn’t respond to a request for comment by press time.

 

 

French Helping Russia

So-called exemplary company

In France, Thales is not just a public company. There are three arguments to support this assertion.

1) The company specializes in the manufacture of systems for military, aerospace and maritime purposes

2) The company's shares are listed on the Paris Stock Exchange

3) It is not so much the private shareholder (the Dassault family with its 24.62% share) that is important, but the French government and its 25.67% share. Simply put, a company that is more than a quarter controlled by the French government, exports components that kill Ukrainians.

Saw an article about a French company selling equipment to Russia but doesn't come as a surprise. Remember, France helped the Nazis in WW2 at the start and their Navy had to be destroyed by allied forces before they could be used to help Germany.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

 This clown is a "Dictator" and if he won't approve two more countries just start a new NATO without him and give it a new name. He likes to kiss Putin ass so let him be on his own. Whatever happened to the democratic Turkey that once existed and now gone forever.

Sad for the people of Turkey that they live under the thumb this dictator and free/fair elections no longer take place because of him. 

Russian Nazis

 I never thought the world would let another Hitler take countries as this world has. Biden, Trump, and so many other leaders (so called) have allowed this to happen. It is long past the time for god to return and remove all of us to try again with a world that doesn't want to kill each other. That is only a dream that will not happen. For some reason all man can do it seems is try to destroy one another. 

Putin is a Nazi who is trying to kill everyone in Ukraine just like Hitler did with the Jews. Europe and the rest of the world stood by and watched for years before they did anything. Now we watch Nazi Russia do the same thing while we DON'T make the Nazis pay a price.

We need to stop all trade/banking and kick them out of the UN as it is also a joke. Cut all contact with them and bankrupt their country if we can. Until they get out of Ukraine and pay for the damage/murders they have committed, we keep all the pain on them that we can.

How is Biden is trying to destroy America - Kill our Economy and Make Americans Dependent on the Government - This is step One

Most voters believe the Biden administration is allowing gas prices to rise to force Americans to use less fossil fuel, a Convention of States Action/Trafalgar Group survey released Friday found.

The survey asked, “Do you believe the Biden Administration is intentionally letting gas prices rise to make Americans use less fossil fuels?”

Opinions are divided along party lines. Over three-quarters of Republicans, 77.3 percent, and 56.5 percent of independents believe the Biden administration is deliberately allowing gas prices to rise for those purposes. Most Democrats, 68.7 percent, disagree and do not believe the administration is doing so.

The survey was taken May 25-29, 2022, among 1,091 likely general election voters and has a margin of error of +/- 2.9 percent. It comes as gas prices broke yet another record high on Friday, jumping to $4.986 overnight, according to AAA. That reflects a 22 cent rise in the last week and a 61 cent rise in the last month.

All the while, the Biden administration has refused to take responsibility for ever-rising prices under Biden’s presidency, ignoring the fact that he attacked American energy independence on day one by nixing the Keystone Pipeline and continued the trend by rejoining the Paris Climate Accord and canceling oil and gas leases. In recent months, Biden has placed the blame on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, even though prices were on the rise far before that event.

“Here’s what your president did when he first came to office,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm during a hearing last month.

“He immediately reentered the Paris Climate Accord. He canceled the Keystone Pipeline. He halted leasing programs in ANWR. He issued a 60-day halt on all new oil and gas leases and drilling permits on federal lands and waters. That’s nationwide,” he said.

“He directed federal agencies to eliminate all supports for fossil fuels. He imposed new regulations on oil and gas and methane emissions. Those were all just in the first few days. Are you telling me that had no effect on our energy supply?” he asked as Granholm remained in denial.

“Here’s what your president did when he first came to office,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm during a hearing last month.

“He immediately reentered the Paris Climate Accord. He canceled the Keystone Pipeline. He halted leasing programs in ANWR. He issued a 60-day halt on all new oil and gas leases and drilling permits on federal lands and waters. That’s nationwide,” he said.

“He directed federal agencies to eliminate all supports for fossil fuels. He imposed new regulations on oil and gas and methane emissions. Those were all just in the first few days. Are you telling me that had no effect on our energy supply?” he asked as Granholm remained in denial.

January 6th Was a Liberal Trap

Whether it was a case of putting politics over security may be determined at some point.

But a report from John Solomon at Just the News describes as a “bombshell” the confirmation that FBI intelligence warned Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, through an aide, that protesters the next day, Jan. 6, 2021, might be violent, but that warning never was given to frontline police commanders.

The warning, in an email sent to a Schumer aide before the riot, raises “new concern that politics trump security preparedness” at the time.

The report explains it was Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher who told Schumer aide Kelly Fado at about 9:40 p.m. on that Jan. 5 that he wanted to “provide you visibility” on intelligence obtained by an FBI threat analysis center.

 

Just the News said it obtained documents that “explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs, and they were plotting to create a ‘perimeter’ for potential violence and to find ‘Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol.’”

It was a website owner who shared the information with the FBI, the report said.

Gallagher warned, “The owner of the website submitted an online tip to the FBI NTOC (National Threat Operations Center) stating that he has noticed a significant uptick in new visitors to his website. We have identified numerous open-source comments indicating groups intentions of finding the tunnel entrances and confronting/blocking” members of Congress.

The warning also cited the possibility of a “perimeter.”

The report said Gallagher, Fado and the Capitol Police press office did not respond to requests for comment.

Included were screen shots of communications showing demonstrators had detailed maps and were considering actions such as to “block all the tunnel exits.”

But Just the News reported documentation from the Senate published last year said the warnings to Schumer were not “distilled” to the chief of the Capitol Police, Steve Sund, or any commanders or officers.

“Key Republican members of Congress told Just the News on Thursday they had been unaware of Gallagher’s tip-off to the Schumer aide and said it provided further evidence that the House Jan. 6 committee, which unveiled prime-time hearings Thursday night, had constricted an investigation to shield Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi from accountability for the botched security they oversaw,” the report revealed.

It quoted Rep. Jim Banks, chief of the House Republican Study Committee, who said, “This is a really a shocking bombshell discovery … that shows the political nature of who received intelligence and who did not.

He was interviewed on “Just the News, Not Noise” television show.

Banks continued, “Remember the Capitol Police officers’ union chief said that they, the rank and file police officers, weren’t tipped off [to] the intelligence, that it was never shared with them. But it was shared with Chuck Schumer’s office, a Democrat leader in the Senate. I mean, this is unbelievable. It’s unfathomable to think that that intelligence was shared on a political basis to Democrat leaders, but not with anybody else.”

And Rep. Rodney Davis of the House Administration Committee this week wrote to Nancy Pelosi’s partisan Jan. 6 investigation committee, through Rep. Bennie Thompson, demanding “that all evidence of communications between congressional leaders and Capitol Police be preserved so that Republicans could investigate it if they take control of Congress in the November elections.”

The Staff: Remember, Nancy will not provide any emails, phone records about January 6th and answer questions as to why security was not requested although President Trump signed off on the 20,000 National Guard troops. We believe she wanted this to happen and helped in NOT providing security which got a women murdered by capital police. 

Golf Sluts Who Support Murder

Golfers suspended by PGA

▪ Sergio Garcia*

▪ Talor Gooch

▪ Branden Grace*

▪ Dustin Johnson*

▪ Matt Jones

▪ Martin Kaymer*

▪ Graeme McDowell*

▪ Phil Mickelson

▪ Kevin Na*

▪ Andy Ogletree

▪ Louis Oosthuizen*

▪ Turk Pettit*

▪ Ian Poulter

▪ Charl Schwartzel*

▪ Hudson Swafford

▪ Peter Uihlein

Secure our SCHOOLS

What the hell is wrong with our elected people. How the hell can you NOT secure the schools and waste more time talking about it. You piss money away buying electric buses to carry children but can't secure the schools where they go. 

I don't want to ever hear we can't afford it as that is crap as Washington can waste our money and doing a study on this or that will no longer be tolerated. Get your collective ass in gear and do your F-ing job to protect our children. 

Electric locks, one entrance, armed guard on duty whenever children are present and one control to unlock all doors should a fire occur. We can launch rockets and no one can tell us we can't secure the f-ing doors. All we need to secure the schools is the desire to really do so. Stop all the talk and just fix the damn problem.  

I am so sick of Washington doing nothing so screw them and the states must take the lead. If we must withhold tax dollars to the federal government and use it to protect the children, do it. I don't think any court would have problem with that. Our federal government has and is failing to keep people safe. When that happens "We the People" must stand up as we have in the past to do so.

Garland and Biden are Lawless

 Now Judge Kavanaugh has been targeted by some nut job who was near his home with weapons and arrested by US marshals. After his arrest he stated he wanted to Kill the Judge. This falls on Biden and Garland as neither follow the law about people gathering outside a Judges home to protest. 

What the hell has to happen before this administration follows the law about this or the border. You can't relay on the FBI as they are just as crooked as this administration has been. I remember a Federal Prosecutor telling the public to never talk with the FBI as they can not be trusted. Biden and Garland don't follow the law and wouldn't know if the laws were tattooed on their forehead so they could read while shaving.  

Biden should be impeached for not enforcing/following the laws along with Garland. Only a dream as this will never happen. Liberals quietly hope for the "Pelican Brief" to hit the conservative judges and that is so very sad. 

Judges should have more security than a sitting president as they are appointed for life where a president gets at the most 8 years. It is always liberals who tend too violent. Think of BLM, Congressman being shot while on a baseball field along with the riots in Portland & Seattle. 

Where does this stop.

 BOTH PARTIES NEED TO STOP THE HATE 

Read Below to See How All Elected people PISS OUR MONEY AND ARE LIARS

President Joe Biden has the pedal pressed to the metal and it’s full speed ahead as his administration continues its intense push to radically transform America into a new green utopia in which electric cars will be the only vehicles on the road, including half a billion dollars for battery materials tucked inside of the controversial $40 billion Ukraine aid package.

 

The $500 million that’s included in the massive foreign giveaway, at a time when conditions on the domestic front are deteriorating by the day, is to “expand funds available under the Defense Production Act to obtain critical battery minerals like nickel, cobalt, lithium and graphite,” according to Bloomberg.

 

“That adds to the $750 million fund mining companies could access when the president invoked the Defense Production Act in March. The Ukraine bill also lifted the cap on the size of grants and expanded eligible projects to include the UK and Australia, as well as the US and Canada,” Bloomberg reported.

 

The additional money is on top of the $7 billion already included in the “infrastructure” bill that passed last year, a legislative package that was chock full of Green New Deal funding as well as social engineering projects as the dramatic overhaul of the nation into a land where fossil fuels will be discarded in favor of sustainable energy sources that while notoriously unreliable, are a major windfall to special interests, especially Democrat donors.

 

Biden, who falsely presented himself as a moderate in order to appeal to swing voters has governed as the most extreme president in U.S. history, declaring war on the domestic fossil fuel industry from day one when he canceled the Keystone XL pipeline on his first day in office, policies that have far more to do with the crushing burden of record prices at the pump than Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s invasion of his neighbor.

 

With frustration building among everyone except the green energy zealots who hold high places in his administration, the nation’s 46th president inadvertently let the cat out of the bag last month that the record-high gas prices are just a part of the “incredible transition” that will continue to bring pain and suffering to ordinary Americans.

 

“When it comes to the gas prices, we’re going through an incredible transition that is taking place that God willing, when it’s over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over,” Biden said at a press conference during his trip to Japan to meet with Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

Bloomberg reports that “Biden’s goal is for half of US passenger car and light-truck sales to be zero-emission by 2030. Current EV manufacturing will have to grow 15 times to do that, according to a Defense Department presentation obtained by Bloomberg.”

 

Mark Jensen, chief executive officer of Indiana-based company American Resources, a company that has developed a cleaner and safer recycling process for recycled battery material than China, thinks “that’s probably not realistic, but he’s happy to try — it’ll be good for business,” according to Bloomberg.