Thursday, July 21, 2011

Sorry

I wish to apologize to anyone and everyone who has read any of my comments. I have been involved with caring for my wife as she was fighting for her life from Ovarian Cancer. On June 12th she lost her battle and I lost my love.

Shortly I will once again be writing and making comments some will not like and many will. One of the first things I will go after has nothing to do with politics but why my wife's passing was preventable.

If my wife had been provided a simple blood test, she would be alive today but in the wisdom of some lame ass people (Physicians Assistant/Doctor) she was not advised about the life saving test nor offered. I point my finger directly at the Physicians Assistant. As we all know the first we thing fill out is a medical history including our extended family. After what happened, they must have used it for toilet paper as these lazy ass people did not bother to read it. If they did, than I would than believe they should be sued for medical malpractice.

My wife's medical history is very easy to understand, eight (8) aunts died from cancer, her mother died from cancer and her father had cancer at his death. Does anyone think her odds of not getting cancer were good? Most women get a screening for Breast Cancer or a Pap Smear for cervical cancer but very few get a CA-125 Blood Test for Ovarian. Far too many doctors tell their patients that the test is not accurate or not needed, yet every cancer center in this country uses it. One doctor here even told her a Pap was no longer needed at her age (64).

Dr. Rosenfeld on Fox News Sunday has EVERY FEMALE patient get the test. The National Cancer Society did a study of 34,000 women and stated they had 3,000 false positive test some of which had follow up that caused problems but found no cancer. No where did they say if anyone was found to have had ovarian and I wonder why. You can't have it both ways where every center uses it but family doctors say it is not needed.

I'm sorry, but who cares about false positives if you can save one person with a simple blood test why not do it. The symptoms for ovarian are not visible until you are usually in Stage Three and at that time your chances of survival are very low. Most women will not see another five years and yet if found in Stage 2, you have an extremely good chance of survival.

This lack of testing has nothing to do with Obamacare but will only get worse under his plan. It is bad enough now that mostly male doctors treat women different and it isn't always males that do. I think it is the lack of caring, reading the family history and being proactive when treating patients.

What I have learned is this, Take care of yourself, search the net for information and always get a second opinion. Learn what testing is out there if you have a family history of cancer or some other disease. If your doctor won't provide the testing with something as simple as a blood test that may save your life, fire the SOB and find a doctor who will work with you. Be sure the doctor is aware of any family history that could follow you as their staff may not look at what you wrote, meaning nurses or physicians assistant.

My wife is gone because a physicians assistant didn't do her job and was not proactive. Marie had a physical about 5 or 6 months before Stage Three appeared and it would have been found at Stage 1 or 2 if the CA-125 had been done with her other blood work. I blame myself for not finding out about test and the physicians assistant for not LOOKING at the family history as it was in Marie's file and discussed (I was present) at times with Donna. As she is no longer with the medical firm where this happened I don't know if it would be fair to mention them.

What I will do now is call that firm and ask if they do the test yet. Well, no one answered and appears they are closed. Their answering service link has been disconnected. The name of the firm was "Total Health" in Boone North Carolina. The branch my wife was treated at was in Newland, NC.

I am glad they are gone given the level of care but the lady who did not look at the family history nor provide the testing she should have is still in the area. Can't do anything about that but she has to live knowing that IF she had ordered the blood work at Marie's physical based on family history, my love would be here now.

Editor: I am sorry for some spelling as it was very hard to write this through the tears. I hope I have corrected all now and remember the test, CA-125 could save your wife or you.

SCARY


 
Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this...BEFORE you VOTE...in case you think Obama's
"looking out for your best interest."

1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646
This government just cannot think of enough ways
to hurt the American people!This Bill must die     FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!
                 
1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 - ANOTHER
NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP.
Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check out HR 4646.  (see below...copied from Snopes)

President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.
This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your account, will have a 1% tax charged.

If your paycheck or your social security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction.
If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank.
Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check into your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged.
 
You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker...Obama takes $50, just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank!.
 

If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged.
Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the
number of ways you are taxed.
Oh, and by the way, you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money...just for putting it in your bank. Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.
                       
Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"! Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made from last year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%.  Still think it's no big deal???
snopes.com:  Debt Free America Act
Is the U.S. government proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or banking transactions?
It is true. The bill is HR-4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio (D-Oregon) and US Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa). Their plan is to sneak it in. To submit the Debt Free America Act (H.R. 4646) , a bill calling for the implementation of a scheme to pay down the...[2010] by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.). His "Debt Free America
Act" (H.R. 4646) would impose a 1 percent "transaction tax" on every financial transaction...
     


 

GAETZ

An attorney representing two women who testified before the House Ethics Committee told ABC News in an interview that former Rep.  Matt Gaet...